Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
The process and importance of systematic reviews
Jacqueline Droogan, Fujian Song1
1NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York.
Clinical effectiveness requires research-based practice, but keeping up with over two million articles annually is challenging for healthcare professionals. Systematic reviews offer a solution by synthesizing evidence for reliable overviews.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- The National Health Service (NHS) prioritizes clinical effectiveness, demanding practice grounded in research over tradition or experience.
- Healthcare practitioners face significant challenges in staying current with the vast and variable quality of biomedical research.
- The sheer volume of biomedical literature (over 2 million articles annually) makes individual critical appraisal difficult for busy clinicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the challenges practitioners face in accessing and appraising research for clinical decision-making.
- To introduce systematic reviews as a method for synthesizing research evidence.
Main Methods:
- Defining systematic reviews as a process for systematically locating, appraising, and synthesizing evidence from scientific studies.
- Emphasizing the goal of obtaining a reliable overview of the available research.
Main Results:
- Systematic reviews provide a structured approach to manage and interpret large volumes of research.
- This method aids in overcoming the time, resource, and skill limitations faced by practitioners.
Conclusions:
- Systematic reviews are crucial for ensuring clinical practice is informed by robust research evidence.
- This approach supports evidence-based practice in healthcare by providing synthesized knowledge.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
