Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces
Stefan Roehling1,2, Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer3, Irmgard Hauser-Gerspach3
1Clinic for Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Hightech Research Center, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Background:
It has been hypothesized that zirconia might have a reduced bacterial adhesion compared with titanium; however, results from experimental studies are rather controversial. The aim of the present study is to compare biofilm formation on zirconia and titanium implant surfaces using an in vitro three-species biofilm and human plaque samples.
Methods:
Experimental disks made of titanium (Ti) or zirconia (ZrO2) with a machined (M) or a sandblasted (SLA) and acid-etched (ZLA) surface topography were produced. An in vitro three-species biofilm or human plaque samples were applied for bacterial adhesion to each type of disk, which after 72 hours of incubation was assessed using an anaerobic flow chamber model.
Results:
Zirconia showed a statistically significant reduction in three-species biofilm thickness compared with titanium (ZrO2-M: 8.41 μm; ZrO2-ZLA: 17.47 μm; Ti-M: 13.12 μm; Ti-SLA: 21.97 μm); however, no differences were found regarding three-species-biofilm mass and metabolism. Human plaque analysis showed optical density values of 0.06 and 0.08 for ZrO2-M and ZrO2-ZLA, and values of 0.1 and 0.13 for Ti-M and Ti-SLA, respectively; indicating a statistically significant reduction in human biofilm mass on zirconia compared with titanium. Additionally, zirconia revealed a statistically significant reduction in human plaque thickness (ZrO2-M: 9.04 μm; ZrO2-ZLA: 13.83 μm; Ti-M: 13.42 μm; Ti-SLA: 21.3 μm) but a similar human plaque metabolism compared with titanium.
Conclusion:
Zirconia implant surfaces showed a statistically significant reduction in human plaque biofilm formation after 72 hours of incubation in an experimental anaerobic flow chamber model compared with titanium implant surfaces.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
03:10Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025