Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effects of short-term VDT usage on visual functions.

P T Yeow1, S P Taylor

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, U.K.M. Malaysia.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|July 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Video Display Terminal (VDT) work showed no significant difference in visual function effects compared to non-VDT tasks. This study assessed visual acuity, accommodation, and convergence in office workers, finding no greater impact from VDT use.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mutations in DYNC2H1, the cytoplasmic dynein 2, heavy chain 1 motor protein gene, cause short-rib polydactyly type I, Saldino-Noonan type.

Clinical genetics·2016
Same author

Collagen duplicate genes of bone and cartilage participate during regeneration of zebrafish fin skeleton.

Gene expression patterns : GEP·2015
Same author

Effect of Field Crops on Population Densities of Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei in Southeastern Australia; Part 1: P. neglectus.

Journal of nematology·2009
Same author

Effect of Field Crops on Density of Pratylenchus in SouthEastern Australia; Part 2: P. thornei.

Journal of nematology·2009
Same author

Experimental inoculation of avian polyomavirus in chemically and virally immunosuppressed chickens.

Avian diseases·1999
Same author

Effects of clorazepate, diazepam, and oxazepam on a laboratory measurement of aggression in men.

International clinical psychopharmacology·1998

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Ophthalmology
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Concerns exist regarding the impact of prolonged screen time on visual health.
  • Understanding the effects of Video Display Terminal (VDT) use versus non-VDT tasks is crucial for workplace ergonomics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively assess the effects of VDT and non-VDT work on visual functions.
  • To investigate impacts on refractive error, visual acuity, accommodation, and convergence across different age and refractive groups.

Main Methods:

  • An on-site comparative study was conducted in an office environment.
  • Two working populations were evaluated under continuous and intermittent VDT usage scenarios.
  • Visual functions including refractive error, visual acuity (VA), accommodation, and convergence were measured.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • VDT work did not demonstrate a significantly greater negative effect on visual functions compared to non-VDT work.
  • No significant differences were observed in visual function changes between VDT and non-VDT work groups.
  • Effects on refractive error varied across different refractive and age groups but were not solely attributable to VDT use.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence suggests VDT work poses no substantially greater risk to visual function than traditional office tasks.
  • Further research may be warranted to explore subtle, long-term effects or specific subgroups.
  • Workplace visual health guidelines should consider both VDT and non-VDT activities holistically.