Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

894
894
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

346
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
346
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

g-Factor Theory of Si/SiGe Quantum Dots: Spin-Valley and Giant Renormalization Effects.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Laser Cooling and Qubit Measurements on a Forbidden Transition in Neutral Cs Atoms.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Efficient Preparation of Entangled States in Cavity QED with Grover's Algorithm.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Multiscale architecture for fast optical addressing and control of large-scale qubit arrays.

Applied optics·2023
Same author

SiGe quantum wells with oscillating Ge concentrations for quantum dot qubits.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer.

Nature·2022
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

Improved Error Thresholds for Measurement-Free Error Correction.

Daniel Crow1, Robert Joynt1, M Saffman1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|October 8, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Measurement-free error correction using neutral atom qubits shows practical error thresholds. This coherent error correction method offers high fault tolerance, achieving error rates comparable to or better than measurement-based approaches.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.5K
High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination
11:24

High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination

Published on: May 13, 2017

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.5K
High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination
11:24

High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination

Published on: May 13, 2017

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum computing
  • Quantum error correction
  • Neutral atom qubits

Background:

  • Limitations and capabilities of neutral atom qubits necessitate advanced error correction.
  • Existing quantum error correction schemes face challenges in achieving practical error thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate measurement-free error correction for neutral atom qubits.
  • To determine if this approach can yield practical error thresholds.
  • To enhance fault tolerance in quantum computations.

Main Methods:

  • Extraction of redundant syndrome information for enhanced fault tolerance.
  • Elimination of ancilla verification through a novel procedure.
  • Simulations of the bit-flip, Bacon-Shor, and Steane codes.

Main Results:

  • Coherent error correction achieved threshold error rates between 10^-3 and 10^-4.
  • Performance is comparable to or surpasses measurement-based error correction.
  • Outperforms previous coherent error correction schemes.

Conclusions:

  • Measurement-free coherent error correction is a viable strategy for neutral atom qubits.
  • This method provides significant fault tolerance and practical error thresholds.
  • Protected logical qubits can be achieved through this advanced error correction technique.