Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
916
Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
Chelsea Blankenship1, Fawen Zhang1, Robert Keith1
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|October 9, 2016
Summary
Cochlear implant (CI) users with impaired temporal processing, measured by gap detection thresholds (GDTs), show poorer speech perception. The clinical Randomized Gap Detection Test (RGDT) can identify these deficits, aiding rehabilitation.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Neuroscience
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
Background:
- Cochlear implant (CI) users exhibit significant variability in speech perception outcomes.
- Individual differences in temporal processing are linked to speech perception performance in CI users.
- Existing gap detection threshold (GDT) measures often use non-clinical paradigms and direct electrical stimulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between temporal processing abilities and speech perception performance in CI users.
- To determine if clinical measures of temporal processing, like the Randomized Gap Detection Test (RGDT), can explain speech perception variability.
Main Methods:
- A correlational study involving 12 postlingually deafened adult CI users and 10 normal-hearing (NH) adults.
- Behavioral GDTs were assessed using the RGDT or Expanded RGDT.
- Speech perception was measured using standardized tests including SRT, W-22, CNC, AzBio, and BKB-SIN.
Main Results:
- Most CI participants demonstrated temporal processing impairments (GDTs > 20 msec) and reduced speech perception compared to NH participants.
- Significant differences were found between CI and NH groups in GDTs and several speech perception tests (SRT, W-22, BKB-SIN).
- In CI users, GDTs significantly correlated with performance on CNC Phoneme, AzBio, and BKB-SIN tests.
Conclusions:
- Variability in temporal acuity among CI users contributes to the wide range of speech perception outcomes.
- The clinically administered RGDT is a suitable tool for identifying CI users with temporal processing deficits.
- Identifying these deficits can guide appropriate rehabilitation strategies for improved speech perception.

