Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame Topic

Surgical Management of an Anterior Mandibular Botryoid Odontogenic Cyst With GBR: A Case Report.

Case reports in dentistry·2026
Same author

Protective factors and critical mucosal thickness for the stability of the peri-implant soft tissue margin over 5 years: A longitudinal cohort study.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

Long-term stability of periodontal plastic surgery featuring traditional autogenous graft and coronally advanced flap alone.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same author

Esthetical and patient-reported outcomes after root coverage procedures for multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same author

How to manage malpositioned implants in the esthetic area.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Applications of Ultrasound Imaging in Dental Implantology: A Systematic Review.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.6K

Immediate, immediate-delayed (6 weeks) and delayed (4 months) post-extractive single implants: 4-month post-loading

Pietro Felice, Giovanni Zucchelli, Gioacchino Cannizzaro

    European Journal of Oral Implantology
    |October 11, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    Dental implant success rates were similar whether placed immediately, 6 weeks, or 4 months after tooth extraction. However, immediate and early placement showed better aesthetic outcomes despite slightly higher complication rates.

    More Related Videos

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    16.0K
    Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
    05:54

    Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

    Published on: October 18, 2021

    2.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

    Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
    14:31

    Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

    Published on: July 15, 2009

    14.6K
    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    16.0K
    Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
    05:54

    Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

    Published on: October 18, 2021

    2.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Dental Implantology
    • Oral Surgery
    • Prosthodontics

    Background:

    • Tooth extraction often necessitates replacement with dental implants.
    • The timing of implant placement post-extraction can influence clinical outcomes.
    • Comparing immediate, early, and delayed implant placement is crucial for optimizing treatment protocols.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the clinical outcomes of single dental implants placed immediately after tooth extraction versus those placed 6 weeks (immediate-delayed) or 4 months (delayed) post-extraction.

    Main Methods:

    • A randomized controlled trial involving 210 patients requiring single implant-supported crowns.
    • Patients were allocated to immediate, immediate-delayed (6 weeks), or delayed (4 months) implant placement groups.
    • Outcomes assessed included implant/crown failures, complications, marginal bone loss, aesthetics (Pink Esthetic Score), and patient satisfaction.

    Main Results:

    • Implant failure rates were 6.0% (immediate), 6.2% (immediate-delayed), and 1.6% (delayed), with no statistically significant difference.
    • Complication rates were also similar across groups, though slightly higher in immediate and immediate-delayed placements.
    • Mean marginal bone loss was comparable, but immediate and immediate-delayed implants demonstrated significantly better aesthetic results.

    Conclusions:

    • Single dental implants can be successfully placed immediately, 6 weeks, or 4 months after tooth extraction with comparable failure rates and patient satisfaction.
    • Immediate and immediate-delayed implant placement may offer superior aesthetic outcomes compared to delayed placement.
    • While complications were slightly more frequent in earlier placement groups, the aesthetic benefits warrant consideration in treatment planning.