Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
Published on: August 2, 2019
Ultra-weak interlayer coupling in two-dimensional gallium selenide
R Longuinhos1, J Ribeiro-Soares1
1Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Lavras, PO Box 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil. jenaina.soares@dfi.ufla.br.
Abstract:
Beyond-graphene two-dimensional (2D) materials are envisioned as the future technology for optoelectronics, and the study of group IIIA metal monochalcogenides (GIIIAMMs) in 2D form is an emerging research field. Bulk gallium selenide (GaSe) is a layered material of this family which is widely used in nonlinear optics and is promising as a lubricant. The interlayer coupling in few-layer GaSe is currently unknown, and the stability of different polytypes is unclear. Here we use symmetry arguments and first-principles calculations to investigate the phase stability, interlayer coupling, and the Raman and infrared activity of the low-frequency shear and breathing modes expected in few-layer GaSe. Strategies to distinguish the number of layers and the β and ε polytypes are discussed. These symmetry results are valid for other isostructural few-layer GIIIAMM materials. Most importantly, by using a linear chain model, we show that the shear and breathing force constants reveal an ultra-weak interlayer coupling at the nanoscale in GaSe. These results suggest that β and ε few-layer GaSe show similar lubricant properties to those observed for few-layer graphite. Our analysis opens new perspectives about the study of interlayer interactions and their role in the mechanical and electrical properties of these new 2D materials.
More Related Videos
06:57Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Verification for Dislocation Reduction in Germanium Epitaxial Layers with Semicylindrical Voids on Silicon
Published on: July 17, 2020
07:50Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization
Published on: July 17, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
In Schottky junctions, where the semiconductor is n-type, applying a positive voltage to the metal relative to the semiconductor reduces its Fermi...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
Schottky Barriers
Schottky barriers arise when a metal with a work function (Φm) contacts a semiconductor with a different work function (Φs). Initially, electrons transfer until the Fermi levels of the metal and semiconductor align at equilibrium. For instance, if Φm > Φs, the semiconductor Fermi level is higher than the metal's before contact. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...