Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
Calibration of the Pooled Cohort Equations for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Update
1From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
New cardiovascular disease risk calculators (PCEs) from 2013 guidelines overestimated actual risk in validation studies. Recalibration may be needed for accurate clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines updated cholesterol management recommendations.
- These guidelines introduced new Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) to estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, including coronary heart disease and stroke.
- The previous Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) served as a prior standard.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze external validation studies of the 2013 PCEs.
- To identify discrepancies between predicted and observed ASCVD risks.
- To discuss potential reasons for these discrepancies and inform future recalibration efforts.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review of published reports evaluating the PCEs.
- Analysis of 15 external validation studies from the US and Europe.
- Assessment of study methodologies, cohort characteristics, and reported outcomes.
Main Results:
- The PCEs overestimated observed ASCVD risk in almost all external validation cohorts.
- Validation cohorts often used more contemporary populations than the guideline development cohorts.
- Significant discrepancies were noted between predicted and actual cardiovascular event rates.
Conclusions:
- The PCEs require recalibration to improve accuracy in current clinical practice.
- Understanding the limitations of validation studies is crucial for interpreting PCE performance.
- Accurate risk prediction is essential for effective cardiovascular disease prevention strategies.
Abstract:
The latest guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, released in fall 2013, provide a long-anticipated update to the recommendations of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). The guidelines incorporate a new risk score for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease that includes stroke as well as coronary heart disease. After publication, the new pooled cohort equations (PCEs) were evaluated in 15 studies from the United States and Europe, most of which used cohorts that were more contemporary than those used in developing the guidelines. In almost all of these external validation cohorts, the PCEs overestimated the observed risk. This narrative review provides an update of the published reports, an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of these validation efforts, and a discussion of possible reasons for the discrepancies. These issues may be useful in a recalibration process designed to better match predicted and observed risks relevant for current clinical practice.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology