Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

769
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
769
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

59
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
59

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The data transparency crisis in research: Lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Reporting of Cohort and Routinely Collected Data in Randomised Controlled Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-ROUTINE): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Does resistance training make a difference to the quality of life or heart health for older adults compared to aerobic exercise? A systematic review protocol from The People's Review.

PloS one·2026
Same author

A Compendium of Reporting Guidelines for Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine from the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network.

Journal of complementary & integrative medicine·2026
Same author

Funders' Expectations for Open Science in Cardiovascular Research: A Scoping Review of the Largest Cardiovascular Research Funders.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 extension statement and explanation: enhancing the reporting and utility of systematic reviews of interventions in paediatrics.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Measuring, Valuing, and Incorporating Patient and Caregiver Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations: A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

ASSESSING COST EFFECTIVENESS IN ONCOLOGY TREATMENT SEQUENCES: A REVIEW OF PATHWAY MODELLING METHODS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Policy Dialogue on Health Technology Assessment in Middle East and North Africa: Reporting from an HTAi initiative.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

What is new in the early health technology assessment's new definition?

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

DEFINING RAPID REVIEWS: A MODIFIED DELPHI CONSENSUS APPROACH.

Shannon E Kelly1, David Moher1, Tammy J Clifford1

  • 1School of Epidemiology,Public Health and Preventive Medicine,University of Ottawa.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
|October 12, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study defined rapid reviews, an accelerated evidence synthesis method, by reaching consensus on key characteristics. The findings highlight their tailored approach to meet decision-maker needs within time constraints.

Keywords:
Decision makingDefinitionDelphiKnowledge synthesisMethodologyRapid reviewsTime factors

More Related Videos

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

5.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

5.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Rapid reviews are an accelerated evidence synthesis approach lacking a universal definition or methodology.
  • Defining characteristics are needed for consistent application and understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive set of defining characteristics for rapid reviews using a modified Delphi consensus approach.
  • To establish a functional definition for rapid reviews.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Delphi consensus study involving sixty-six experts in rapid reviews and evidence synthesis.
  • Three survey rounds were conducted to achieve consensus on statements defining rapid reviews, with agreement set at ≥70%.

Main Results:

  • Consensus was reached on ten out of eleven statements describing rapid review characteristics.
  • Rapid reviews are defined by their aim to meet decision-maker requirements and timelines, using accelerated and tailored methods.

Conclusions:

  • Consensus was achieved on ten defining characteristics for rapid reviews based on expert opinion.
  • The importance of the decision-maker's role and transparent reporting in rapid reviews was emphasized.