Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay ELISPOT: Quantification of Th-1 Cellular Immune Responses Against Microbial Antigens
Published on: November 23, 2010
Comparing TSPOT assay results between an Elispot reader and manual counts
Saroochi Agarwal1, Duc T Nguyen2, Justin D Lew2
1Houston Methodist Hospital Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; University of Texas School of Public Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, 1200 Pressler St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Automated and manual T-SPOT.TB (TSPOT) testing show good agreement in healthcare workers. However, individual technician variability exists, potentially impacting borderline results for tuberculosis infection diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Assays
Background:
- The T-SPOT.TB (TSPOT) assay is an interferon-gamma release assay used for tuberculosis infection detection.
- TSPOT results can be determined using automated Elispot readers or manual counting by technicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the agreement between automated and manual reading methods for T-SPOT.TB assay results.
- To investigate factors influencing agreement between different TSPOT counting methodologies.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 2481 US healthcare workers.
- Analysis of TSPOT results using Cohen's kappa coefficient for inter-rater agreement.
- Logistic regression to assess the contribution of selected variables.
Main Results:
- High agreement rates between automated and manual TSPOT readings were observed (92.3%–93.1%).
- Good overall inter-rater agreement was found (kappa = 0.71).
- Significant variability in agreement levels was noted between individual technicians and the automated reader.
Conclusions:
- Automated Elispot readers and manual counts demonstrate good agreement for TSPOT in low TB burden settings.
- Inter-observer variability among technicians may affect the interpretation of borderline TSPOT results.
- The lack of a gold standard for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prevents definitive conclusions on the superiority of either reading method.
More Related Videos
15:57Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
Published on: July 11, 2015
08:26The Isolation, Differentiation, and Quantification of Human Antibody-secreting B Cells from Blood: ELISpot as a Functional Readout of Humoral Immunity
Published on: December 14, 2016