Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatic Spinal Reflexes01:22

Somatic Spinal Reflexes

6.6K
Somatic spinal reflexes are rapid, involuntary muscular responses to external stimuli that involve the somatic musculature and the spinal cord.
One of the most well-known somatic spinal reflexes is the stretch reflex, which is activated by the sudden stretching of a muscle. This reflex involves the activation of specialized sensory receptors called muscle spindles, which are located in the muscle tissue and detect changes in the length and speed of muscle contractions. When a muscle is suddenly...
6.6K
Design Example: Frog Muscle Response01:14

Design Example: Frog Muscle Response

668
A student is tasked to work on an intriguing experiment involving an RL (Resistor-Inductor) circuit to study the muscle response of a frog's leg to electrical stimulation. The RL circuit plays a crucial role in this experiment, providing the means to control and measure the electrical impulses that trigger muscle contraction.
When the switch connecting the RL circuit is closed, a brief muscle contraction is observed. This is because, at a steady state, the inductor acts like a short...
668
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.9K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.9K
Long-term Potentiation01:35

Long-term Potentiation

59.2K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre- and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
59.2K
Long-term Potentiation01:25

Long-term Potentiation

3.8K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
3.8K
Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles01:29

Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles

6.5K
The period of muscle contraction primarily influences the duration of stimulation at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the presence of free calcium ions in the sarcoplasm, and the availability of energy or ATP to support contractions.
When an action potential reaches the axon terminal, it depolarizes the membrane and opens voltage-gated sodium channels. Sodium ions enter the cell, further depolarizing the presynaptic membrane. This depolarization causes voltage-gated calcium channels to open....
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dissociating variability from error-based processes in observational learning.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

What Is the StartReact Effect?

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Imitation performance biases are moderated by perceived accuracy in golf putting.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Dual agonist and antagonist muscle vibration produces a bias in end point with no change in variability.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same journal

Epidemiological characteristics of amebiasis in Japan from 2001 to 2022.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal associations of academic stress with eating related patterns, nutrition, somatic indicators, and depressive symptoms in university students: A study protocol.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Pollution removal efficiency enhancement by agricultural biomass additions in constructed wetlands: A framework integrating meta-analysis with explainable machine learning.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Insulation failure mapping on power transformer bushing using FRA and electrostatic simulation.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Enhancing medical Q&A systems with multimodal knowledge graphs and dual-layer attention mechanisms.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

UAMP: Consistent video object segmentation with uncertainty-aware memory propagation.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K

Perturbation Predictability Can Influence the Long-Latency Stretch Response.

Christopher J Forgaard1, Ian M Franks1, Dana Maslovat1

  • 1School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Plos One
|October 12, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Perturbation predictability influences long-latency stretch responses (M2). Longer, less predictable foreperiods in passive conditions increased M2 activity, suggesting altered neural processing even with variable timing.

More Related Videos

The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System EPOCS: A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders
10:08

The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System EPOCS: A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders

Published on: August 25, 2022

3.4K
Inducing Long-Term Plasticity of Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability in Neurons of the Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
05:01

Inducing Long-Term Plasticity of Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability in Neurons of the Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Published on: September 20, 2024

845

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K
The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System EPOCS: A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders
10:08

The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System EPOCS: A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders

Published on: August 25, 2022

3.4K
Inducing Long-Term Plasticity of Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability in Neurons of the Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
05:01

Inducing Long-Term Plasticity of Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability in Neurons of the Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Published on: September 20, 2024

845

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • Perturbations elicit short (M1) and long-latency (M2) muscle responses.
  • M1 involves spinal reflexes; M2 involves spinal and supra-spinal pathways.
  • M2 magnitude is modulated by participant intention and perturbation predictability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different variable foreperiod durations influence M2 response modulation.
  • To determine the impact of perturbation predictability on M2 magnitude.

Main Methods:

  • Fifteen participants performed active and passive wrist flexor responses to perturbations.
  • Trials used either short (2.5-3.5s) or long (2.5-10.5s) variable foreperiods.
  • M1 and M2 responses were recorded and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • M1 responses showed no significant differences across conditions.
  • M2 responses were larger in active versus passive conditions.
  • In passive conditions, long variable foreperiods yielded greater M2 activity than short ones.

Conclusions:

  • Perturbation predictability, even with variable foreperiods, affects M2 response.
  • Neural circuitry contributing to the long-latency stretch reflex is sensitive to temporal predictability.
  • Findings highlight the role of anticipation in modulating motor responses.