Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

19:44
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
Published on: June 3, 2009
14.2K
TAPSE: An old but useful tool in different diseases
Elio Aloia1, Matteo Cameli1, Flavio D'Ascenzi1
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
International Journal of Cardiology
|October 12, 2016
Summary
Assessing right ventricular (RV) systolic function is crucial for heart health outcomes. New methods are needed due to challenges in calculating RV ejection fraction (RVEF) and limitations of current imaging techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Right ventricular (RV) function is vital for overall cardiac health and has prognostic implications in various cardiovascular diseases.
- RV longitudinal contraction contributes significantly (up to 80%) to RV function, more so than transverse shortening.
- Accurate calculation of RV ejection fraction (RVEF) is challenging due to complex RV geometry and difficulty in endocardial delineation, especially with apical trabeculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the difficulties in accurately assessing RV ejection fraction (RVEF) using current methods.
- To discuss the limitations of the gold standard cardiac MRI for RV assessment due to its resource-intensive nature.
- To introduce alternative parameters developed for evaluating RV systolic function.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on right ventricular function assessment.
- Discussion of challenges in geometric modeling for RVEF calculation.
- Identification of alternative echocardiographic parameters for RV systolic function evaluation.
Main Results:
- Complex RV geometry and prominent trabeculations hinder accurate RVEF calculation.
- Cardiac MRI, while the gold standard, is not widely accessible.
- Several alternative parameters, including TAPSE, S', and speckle tracking longitudinal strain, have been developed to assess RV systolic function.
Conclusions:
- Accurate RVEF assessment remains a significant clinical challenge.
- There is a need for more accessible and reliable methods to evaluate RV systolic function.
- Parameters like TAPSE, S', and speckle tracking offer potential alternatives for RV function assessment.

