Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026
Three-dimensional Location Approach with Silk Thread Guided Laparoscopic Segmentectomy for Liver Tumor
Published on: May 23, 2025
Tumor resection at the pelvis using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments: a case series
Thorsten Jentzsch1, Lazaros Vlachopoulos2, Philipp Fürnstahl2
1Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. thorsten.jentzsch@balgrist.ch.
Background:
Sarcomas are associated with a relatively high local recurrence rate of around 30 % in the pelvis. Inadequate surgical margins are the most important reason. However, obtaining adequate margins is particularly difficult in this anatomically demanding region. Recently, three-dimensional (3-D) planning, printed models, and patient-specific instruments (PSI) with cutting blocks have been introduced to improve the precision during surgical tumor resection. This case series illustrates these modern 3-D tools in pelvic tumor surgery.
Methods:
The first consecutive patients with 3-D-planned tumor resection around the pelvis were included in this retrospective study at a University Hospital in 2015. Detailed information about the clinical presentation, imaging techniques, preoperative planning, intraoperative surgical procedures, and postoperative evaluation is provided for each case. The primary outcome was tumor-free resection margins as assessed by a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the specimen. The secondary outcomes were precision of preoperative planning and complications.
Results:
Four patients with pelvic sarcomas were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 7.8 (range, 6.0-9.0) months. The combined use of preoperative planning with 3-D techniques, 3-D-printed models, and PSI for osteotomies led to higher precision (maximal (max) error of 0.4 centimeters (cm)) than conventional 3-D planning and freehand osteotomies (max error of 2.8 cm). Tumor-free margins were obtained where measurable (n = 3; margins were not assessable in a patient with curettage). Two insufficiency fractures were noted postoperatively.
Conclusions:
Three-dimensional planning as well as the intraoperative use of 3-D-printed models and PSI are valuable for complex sarcoma resection at the pelvis. Three-dimensionally printed models of the patient anatomy may help visualization and precision. PSI with cutting blocks help perform very precise osteotomies for adequate resection margins.
