Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
Published on: January 19, 2022
Individual difference in configural associative learning
Nicola C Byrom1, Robin A Murphy1
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
Abstract:
Individuals differ in their ability to acquire associations between stimuli and paired outcomes, an ability that has been proposed to be independent of general metrics of intelligence or memory (e.g., Kaufman, DeYoung, Gray, Brown, & Mackintosh, 2009). The nature of these differences may reflect the type of associative structures acquired during learning, for instance, configuring stimuli to facilitate flexible learning and memory. We test the hypothesis that individuals differ in configural associative learning as distinct from simpler (elemental) stimulus-outcome learning. In Experiment 1 participants were screened for attentional scope and we found that attentional scope predicted configural associative learning that could not be explained simply in terms of differences in strength of associative learning. In Experiment 2, attentional scope was trained resulting in a shift in participants' ability to learn about subsequent configurations unrelated to the training material. We discuss how the differences between individual learners reflect differences in configuring rather than simply differences in strength or speed of learning. (PsycINFO Database Record
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Observational Learning
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

