Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian
Ngai-Yin Chan1, Nim-Pong Kwong2, Adrian-Piers Cheong3
1Princess Margaret Hospital, 2-10 Princess Margaret Hospital Road, Lai Chi Kok, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Insights
Contrast-guided axillary vein puncture (AP) reduces long-term pacemaker lead failure compared to subclavian puncture (SP). AP also offers higher success rates than cephalic vein cutdown (CV) for venous access during pacemaker implantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Devices
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Long-term pacemaker lead failure (PLF) data regarding venous access methods are limited and conflicting.
- Understanding optimal venous access is crucial for pacemaker longevity and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of PLF between contrast-guided axillary vein puncture (AP) and subclavian puncture (SP).
- To evaluate if AP is comparable to cephalic vein cutdown (CV) regarding PLF.
- To assess the success rates of AP, SP, and CV for venous access in pacemaker implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 409 patients with 681 implanted pacemaker leads.
- Leads were implanted via AP (252), CV (217), or SP (212).
- Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PLF over a mean follow-up of 73.6 months.
Main Results:
- A total of 20 (2.9%) PLF occurred.
- PLF rates were 1.2% for AP, 2.3% for CV, and 5.6% for SP.
- Subclavian puncture (SP) was the only independent predictor of increased PLF risk (HR 0.261, P=0.042) compared to AP.
- Venous access success rates were significantly higher for AP (97.6%) and SP (96.8%) than for CV (78.2%).
Conclusions:
- Axillary vein puncture (AP) independently predicts a lower risk of pacemaker lead failure (PLF) compared to subclavian puncture (SP).
- Cephalic vein cutdown (CV) showed a higher PLF rate than AP.
- AP and SP demonstrated similar high success rates for venous access, while CV was significantly less successful, suggesting AP as a preferred venous access for pacemaker leads.
Aims:
Existing data on the relationship between venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure (PLF) are scarce and inconsistent. We aim to study the hypothesis that contrast-guided axillary vein puncture (AP) is better than subclavian puncture (SP) and similar to cephalic vein cutdown (CV) in the incidence of PLF and the success rate of AP is higher than CV.
Methods And Results:
The case records of 409 patients with 681 implantable pacemaker leads were reviewed. Two hundred and fifty-two, 217, and 212 leads were implanted via AP, CV, and SP, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 73.6 ± 33.1 months, 20 (2.9%) PLF occurred. Three (1.2%), 5 (2.3%), and 12 (5.6%) PLF occurred in the AP, CV, and SP groups, respectively. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the only independent predictor for PLF was the use of SP instead of AP (AP vs. SP; hazard ratio: 0.261; 95% confidence interval: 0.071-0.954, P = 0.042). The success rate of CV (78.2%) was significantly lower than those of AP (97.6%) and SP (96.8%) (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Compared with SP, the use of AP but not CV independently predicted a lower risk of PLF. The success rates in achieving venous accesses were similar between AP and SP, but significantly lower for CV. Axillary vein puncture may thus be considered the venous access of choice for pacemaker lead implantation.
More Related Videos
05:51Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
07:47The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Hemodialysis I: Introduction