Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

Nuclear reprogramming is a process of transforming one cell type into an unrelated cell type by epigenetic changes that alter the cell’s original gene expression pattern. Such epigenetic changes force cells to express a different set of genes, which play a significant role in inducing transformation into other cell types. Nuclear reprogramming offers applications in reproductive cloning for livestock propagation and regenerative medicine — developing patient-specific cells for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

DNA methylation reprogramming in marsupial embryos is restricted to the extraembryonic lineage.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Mycobacterium tuberculosis IDH-PPARγ interaction suppresses GPX4 to drive macrophage ferroptosis and sustain persistent infection.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Single-nucleus analysis reveals human-specific oligodendrocyte polarization and conserved neuronal responses after severe traumatic brain injury.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Gut microbiota-induced perturbation in bile acids alter keratinocyte lipid metabolism via FXR-NQO1 signaling in psoriasis.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Expanding the human proteome with microproteins and peptideins.

Nature·2026

Same author

The Impact of Low-Protein Diet on the Molecular and Cellular Development of the Fetal Kidney.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2026

Same journal

ALDH18A1 fuels spermine biosynthesis to sustain ferroptosis resistance in cancer and ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

Same journal

Circular RNA circ_0001829 attenuates G2/M arrest to promote hepatocyte proliferation by sponging miR-3095-3p following liver injury.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

Same journal

Identification of PGF+ endothelial cells associated with plaque instability in carotid atherosclerosis by scRNA-seq and RNA-seq analysis.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

Same journal

BMSCs-derived exosomal miR-196a-5p promotes macrophage M2 polarization and osteogenesis in postmenopausal osteoporosis through regulating Rspo2/Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

Same journal

MicroRNA-6833-3p drives prostate cancer progression and stemness by targeting the NUMB-mediated NOTCH signaling pathway.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

Same journal

OTUD5 promotes AML progression by stabilizing SLC7A11 to suppress ferroptosis.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Published on: February 24, 2023

Computational methods for direct cell conversion.

Uma S Kamaraj¹, Julian Gough², Jose M Polo³

¹a Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School , Singapore.

Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)

|October 14, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Computational methods can predict transcription factors for directed cell conversion (transdifferentiation). However, predictions vary due to data and algorithms, impacting downstream regulatory effects. High-quality single-cell data is crucial for improving accuracy.

Keywords:

algorithm prediction transcription factor transdifferentiation

More Related Videos

A Simple Migration/Invasion Workflow Using an Automated Live-cell Imager

A Simple Migration/Invasion Workflow Using an Automated Live-cell Imager

Published on: February 2, 2019

In vitro Modeling for Neurological Diseases using Direct Conversion from Fibroblasts to Neuronal Progenitor Cells and Differentiation into Astrocytes

In vitro Modeling for Neurological Diseases using Direct Conversion from Fibroblasts to Neuronal Progenitor Cells and Differentiation into Astrocytes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Published on: February 24, 2023

A Simple Migration/Invasion Workflow Using an Automated Live-cell Imager

A Simple Migration/Invasion Workflow Using an Automated Live-cell Imager

Published on: February 2, 2019

In vitro Modeling for Neurological Diseases using Direct Conversion from Fibroblasts to Neuronal Progenitor Cells and Differentiation into Astrocytes

In vitro Modeling for Neurological Diseases using Direct Conversion from Fibroblasts to Neuronal Progenitor Cells and Differentiation into Astrocytes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Area of Science:

Stem cell biology and regenerative medicine
Computational biology and bioinformatics
Genetics and epigenetics

Background:

Directed cell conversion, or transdifferentiation, uses transcription factors to change one cell type to another.
Experimental identification of these factors is slow and costly, limiting progress in the field.
Advancements in transcriptional data and algorithmic approaches offer potential to accelerate transdifferentiation research.

Purpose of the Study:

To review computational methods for predicting transdifferentiation factors.
To analyze validated in-silico predictions, highlighting their differences and similarities.
To assess the impact of these predictions on downstream regulatory influences.

Main Methods:

Literature review of computational methods for predicting transdifferentiation factors.
Analysis of experimentally validated in-silico predictions from various algorithms.
Comparison of predicted factors based on source cells, gene expression quantification, and algorithmic steps.

Main Results:

Computational methods predict different sets of transcription factors for transdifferentiation.
Variations in predictions stem from differences in source cells, data quantification, and algorithms.
Predicted factors influence downstream regulation differently, affecting developmental or mature cell processes.

Conclusions:

Computational approaches provide a foundation for identifying novel transdifferentiation factors.
Improving prediction accuracy and consistency requires high-quality gene expression data from single cells or pure populations.
Further research should focus on standardizing data collection and refining algorithms for more reliable factor prediction.