Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nicky Hayes1

  • 1King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London.

Nursing Older People
|October 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Grogan ruling failed to clarify primary health needs assessment for continuing care. New national criteria are needed to guide clinicians in distinguishing health needs from accommodation support.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the feasibility of an Education-Career pathway in Healthcare for Older People (ECHO) for early career nurses.

International journal of older people nursing·2023
Same author

Professional development and career planning for nurses working in care homes for older people: A scoping review.

International journal of older people nursing·2022
Same author

Metagenomic and HT-qPCR analysis reveal the microbiome and resistome in pig slurry under storage, composting, and anaerobic digestion.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2022
Same author

Developing a competency framework for early career nurses undertaking post-registration education in care for older people.

Nursing older people·2022
Same author

Repressive Moralism: World Making and Petty Fascism in Transgender Politics.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2022
Same author

Evaluating a specialist education programme for nurses and allied health professionals working in older people care: A qualitative analysis of motivations and impact.

Nurse education today·2020
Same journal

Pressure ulcer healing in hospitalised older adults: a scoping review.

Nursing older people·2026
Same journal

Supporting effective shared decision-making with people with dementia.

Nursing older people·2026
Same journal

How to develop nursing student practice placement opportunities in care homes.

Nursing older people·2026
Same journal

Building resilience through adversity: exploring the experiences of older migrant women.

Nursing older people·2026
Same journal

Recognition and management of hearing loss in older adults in care homes.

Nursing older people·2026
Same journal

Performative empathy in dementia care: ethics and practice.

Nursing older people·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Law
  • Social Care Policy
  • Clinical Needs Assessment

Background:

  • The Maureen Grogan vs Bexley NHS Care Trust case (2006) examined the application of a 'primary health needs approach'.
  • This approach is used to determine if continuing care needs are primarily health-related or incidental to local authority accommodation duties.
  • The judgment did not provide clear definitions for these crucial terms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implications of the Grogan judgment on assessing continuing healthcare needs.
  • To highlight the lack of clarity regarding the 'primary health needs approach' in legal and clinical practice.
  • To express the need for updated national eligibility criteria and guidance.

Main Methods:

  • Legal case review (Maureen Grogan vs Bexley NHS Care Trust).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the interpretation and application of 'primary health needs' criteria.
  • Discussion of the impact on clinical decision-making in continuing care assessments.

    • Main Results:

    • The Grogan judgment did not sufficiently clarify the distinction between primary health needs and accommodation-related needs.
    • Clinicians lack clear guidance for applying the 'primary health needs approach' in practice.
    • Ambiguity persists regarding the assessment of continuing care needs.

    Conclusions:

    • The Grogan ruling has not improved the understanding or application of primary health needs assessments.
    • There is a pressing need for updated national eligibility criteria and guidance.
    • Clearer definitions and support are essential for clinicians making complex care eligibility decisions.