Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

07:19
Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
Published on: November 25, 2016
12.1K
Pollinator adaptation and the evolution of floral nectar sugar composition
S Abrahamczyk1, M Kessler2, D Hanley3
1Nees Institute for Plant Biodiversity, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|October 18, 2016
Summary
Nectar sugar composition (nectar sucrose proportion) evolves, but weakly, towards specialist or generalist pollinators. Pollinators may adapt to plant nectar, not vice-versa, challenging adaptation-only views.
Area of Science:
- Plant-pollinator interactions
- Evolutionary biology
- Ecology
Background:
- The evolution of nectar sugar composition is debated, with hypotheses including adaptation to pollinators versus phylogenetic constraints.
- Nectar sucrose proportion (NSP) is a key trait in nectar evolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hypothesis that nectar sucrose proportion (NSP) evolves as an adaptation to pollinator groups (PGs).
- To investigate the interplay between nectar evolution and pollinator behavior.
Main Methods:
- A modeling approach was used to analyze NSP evolution across approximately 2100 asterid species.
- Phylogenetic comparative methods were employed to assess evolutionary patterns.
Main Results:
- The hypothesis that NSP evolves in adaptation to PGs could not be rejected, with optimal NSP values emerging for specialist and generalist pollinators.
- The adaptive process was found to be weak, indicating that PG adaptation explains only part of nectar evolution.
- Nectar sucrose proportion and pollinator group evolution are correlated, suggesting pollinators may adapt to nectar composition.
Conclusions:
- Nectar evolution is influenced by pollinator groups but also by other factors like floral traits and the abiotic environment.
- Pollinator foraging behavior and dietary needs may adapt to existing nectar composition, rather than plants solely adapting nectar to pollinators.
- Unexpectedly sucrose-poor nectar in some bird-pollinated plants suggests potential pollinator deception, highlighting the complexity of nectar evolution.
Related Concept Videos
Pollination and Flower Structure
79.8K
Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.
79.8K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
17.0K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
17.0K
Genetics of Speciation
22.9K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
22.9K
Phloem and Sugar Transport
40.5K
Like many living organisms, plants have tissues that specialize in specific plant functions. For example, shoots are well adapted to rapid growth, while roots are structured to acquire resources efficiently. However, sugar production is primarily restricted to the photosynthetic cells that reside in the leaves of angiosperm plants. Sugar and other resources are transported from photosynthetic tissues to other specialized tissues by a process called translocation.
40.5K
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.1K

