Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

2.2K
Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
2.2K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

58.4K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
58.4K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.2K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.2K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.4K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Physical activity moderates the relationship between hot flashes and arterial wave reflection in perimenopausal females.

Physiological reports·2026
Same author

Advancing Equity for Asian American Medical Students in Honors Society Selection.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Distinguishing hot flashes and night sweats: a mixed-method analysis.

Menopause (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Wordsworth: A generative word dataset for comparison of speech representations in humans and neural networks.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Fast Multigroup Gaussian Process Factor Models.

Neural computation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.9K

Distinguishing Neural Adaptation and Predictive Coding Hypotheses in Auditory Change Detection.

Renée M Symonds1, Wei Wei Lee1, Adam Kohn1

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

Brain Topography
|October 19, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) research distinguishes between neural adaptation and prediction error. This study found expectation violation without stimulus change differs from MMN, suggesting distinct neural bases.

Keywords:
AttentionEvent-related brain potentials (ERPs)ExpectationMismatch negativity (MMN)Novelty detectionPredictive coding

More Related Videos

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.7K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.9K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.7K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)

Background:

  • Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is a neural index for detecting auditory changes.
  • MMN is generated by infrequent deviant sounds among frequent standard sounds.
  • Debate exists whether MMN arises from neural adaptation or prediction error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate stimulus-specific adaptation from expectation violation in auditory change detection.
  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying MMN and expectation violation responses.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a unique stimulus design to compare expectation violation with and without stimulus change.
  • Analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) to assess differences in neural responses.

Main Results:

  • Expectation violation responses without stimulus change showed distinct timing, scalp distribution, and attentional modulation compared to MMN.
  • Evidence suggests the expectation violation response alone may not involve the canonical MMN.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides evidence that expectation violation responses, particularly those without stimulus change, may involve a different neural substrate than MMN.
  • A novel hypothesis proposes distinct neural mechanisms for expectation violation and canonical MMN.