Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Precise and Clinically Relevant Models for Studying Secondary Degeneration in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
Published on: November 29, 2024
Identifying and Managing Malingering and Factitious Disorder in the Military
Sebastian Schnellbacher1, Heather O'Mara2
1Faculty Development Fellowship, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Jackson Ave, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA. sebastian.r.schnellbacher.mil@mail.mil.
Abstract:
Malingering is the intentional fabrication of medical symptoms for the purpose of external gain. Along similar lines as malingering, factitious disorder is the intentional creation or exaggeration of symptoms, but without intent for a concrete benefit. The incidence of malingering and factitious disorder in the military is unclear, but likely under reported for a variety of reasons. One should be aware of potential red flags suggesting malingering or factitious disorder and consider further evaluation to look for these conditions. A deliberate and intentional management plan is ideal in these cases. Furthermore, a multi-disciplinary team approach, a non-judgmental environment, and the use of direct but dignity sparing techniques will likely be most "successful" when confronting the patient with malingering or factitious disorder.
Insights
Malingering, the fabrication of symptoms for gain, and factitious disorder, symptom exaggeration without gain, are challenging in the military. Awareness of red flags and a structured approach are key for diagnosis and management.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Military Medicine
Background:
- Malingering involves intentionally faking medical symptoms for external gain.
- Factitious disorder involves intentionally creating or exaggerating symptoms without a clear external benefit.
- The prevalence of malingering and factitious disorder in military populations is not well-defined and likely underreported.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the importance of recognizing potential red flags for malingering and factitious disorder in military personnel.
- To emphasize the need for further evaluation to identify these conditions.
- To outline effective management strategies for suspected cases.
Main Methods:
- Awareness of potential indicators and red flags associated with malingering and factitious disorder.
- Consideration for further diagnostic evaluation when these conditions are suspected.
- Development of a deliberate and intentional management plan.
Main Results:
- Malingering and factitious disorder present unique diagnostic and management challenges within the military context.
- Early identification of red flags is crucial for timely intervention.
- A structured, multi-disciplinary approach is recommended for effective patient management.
Conclusions:
- Healthcare providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for malingering and factitious disorder in the military.
- A comprehensive, non-judgmental, and dignity-preserving approach is essential when addressing these conditions.
- Effective management relies on a coordinated, multi-disciplinary team effort and a clear treatment plan.
More Related Videos
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
09:55Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Dissociative Identity Disorder
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Dissociative Amnesia
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Cognitive Dissonance
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...