Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Wendy Jehan1

  • 1At South Downs NHS Trust, based in Brighton.

Nursing Management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)
|May 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Individuals should be able to supplement their healthcare if they can afford it. However, all patients must receive essential care based on need, irrespective of their financial status. Operational guidance presents potential challenges.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paying for additional care in the private sector.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2009
Same author

A question of faith.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2009
Same author

Advanced primary nursing: liberating the talents.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Healthcare Economics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Current healthcare systems face challenges in balancing access, quality, and cost.
  • Debates persist regarding the role of private funding in public healthcare.
  • Ensuring equitable access to essential medical services remains a global priority.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical and practical implications of allowing individuals to "top up" their healthcare.
  • To examine the principle of providing minimum care on a "needs" basis for all patients.
  • To identify potential operational challenges in implementing such a hybrid healthcare model.

Main Methods:

  • This is a conceptual analysis based on ethical principles and healthcare policy frameworks.
  • The study reviews existing literature on healthcare financing and patient rights.
  • It involves a critical discussion of the "needs" basis versus "ability to pay" in healthcare provision.

Main Results:

  • The right to supplement healthcare is supported, provided a baseline of care is guaranteed for all.
  • A "needs"-based approach ensures equity, but defining and delivering "minimum care" requires clear operational standards.
  • Potential conflicts may arise between private top-up services and publicly funded essential care.

Conclusions:

  • A hybrid healthcare model, allowing supplementary private funding alongside a guaranteed public "needs"-based minimum, is ethically justifiable.
  • Successful implementation hinges on robust, transparent operational guidance to prevent inequities.
  • Careful policy design is crucial to maintain universal access to essential healthcare services.

Related Experiment Videos