Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Restoration of stimulus associability, electrodermal activity, and processing resource allocation.

J S Packer1, D A Siddle, C Tipp

  • 1School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.

Biological Psychology
|April 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study tested if reducing a stimulus's predictive accuracy increases its associability. Results showed that neither stimulus miscuing nor omission restored stimulus associability, challenging existing learning theories.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

Pain relief using smart technology: an overview of a new patient-controlled analgesia device.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2000
Same author

The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

Smart technology improves patient-controlled analgesia: a preliminary report.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1999
Same author

The effects of threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification.

Psychophysiology·1999
Same author

Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.

Psychophysiology·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Learning and memory

Background:

  • Pearce and Hall (1980) proposed that decreased predictive accuracy enhances stimulus associability.
  • This theory suggests that unpredictability increases attention and processing of a stimulus.
  • Previous research explored this concept using various learning paradigms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether stimulus miscuing or omission restores stimulus associability.
  • To assess changes in stimulus associability through electrodermal responses and reaction time (RT).
  • To evaluate the findings against current associative learning theories.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using miscuing (S2 following S3) and omission (S2 absent) paradigms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimulus associability was measured by skin conductance responses and RT to secondary probe stimuli.
  • Control groups experienced consistent stimulus pairings, while experimental groups encountered altered predictive accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Miscuing S2 did not alter skin conductance responses to S3 or RT to probe stimuli following S3.
    • Omission of S2 did not affect RT to probe stimuli presented during S1.
    • No significant differences in stimulus associability were found between experimental and control groups in any experiment.

    Conclusions:

    • The results do not support Pearce and Hall's (1980) proposal that reduced predictive accuracy restores stimulus associability.
    • Neither miscuing nor omission led to increased orienting or controlled processing as predicted.
    • The findings necessitate a re-evaluation of current associative learning models.