Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Propositional knowledge and mere responding.

I Martin1, A B Levey

  • 1Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London, U.K.

Biological Psychology
|April 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topological Magneto-optics in the Noncoplanar Antiferromagnet Co_{1/3}NbS_{2}: Imaging and Writing Chiral Magnetic Domains.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Finding the middle way: rethinking cGMP for sterility testing of cellular therapy products in minimal manipulation settings.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2025
Same author

A comparative analysis of PFAS in archive and fresh soil samples in England and implications for large-scale surveys.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025
Same author

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bilastine 10 mg/d in Children Aged 2 to 5 Years With Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis or Urticaria: A Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology·2024
Same author

Elimination of Interface Energy Barriers Using Dendrimer Polyelectrolytes with Fractal Geometry.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2023
Same author

Black Ultra-Thin Crystalline Silicon Wafers Reach the 4n<sup>2</sup> Absorption Limit-Application to IBC Solar Cells.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2023
Same journal

Neural Response to Reward and Pathological Personality Dimensions.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Early automatic and late lateralised top-down mechanisms for 3D perception.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Preliminary evidence for context-dependent modulation of interoceptive signals in social evaluation.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activity is associated with greater situational attributions and longer blame explanations in natural language.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing proprioceptive accuracy: An analysis of the joint position reproduction test.

Biological psychology·2026
See all related articles

This commentary critiques Furedy and Riley's (1987) view of classical conditioning, arguing their cognitive component definition is too narrow for human learning. It highlights limitations in their propositional learning model for understanding cognition in conditioning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Classical conditioning is a fundamental learning process.
  • Furedy and Riley (1987) proposed propositional learning as a cognitive component of conditioning.
  • This view separates cognitive aspects from response acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate Furedy and Riley's (1987) analysis of classical conditioning.
  • To explore the role of cognition in human conditioning.
  • To integrate propositional learning models with animal conditioning theories.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary and critical analysis of existing theories.
  • Comparison of propositional learning models with cognitive science developments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the Rescorla and Wagner (1972) model.

    • Main Results:

    • Furedy and Riley's (1987) definition of cognitive components in conditioning is considered too restrictive.
    • Their propositional account may overlook broader applications of propositional knowledge in cognitive science.
    • The commentary suggests their interpretation of associative mechanisms in conditioning models is incomplete.

    Conclusions:

    • The current understanding of cognition in classical conditioning requires a broader scope than proposed by Furedy and Riley (1987).
    • Further integration of propositional models and associative mechanisms is needed for a comprehensive theory of conditioning.
    • Future research should consider the full spectrum of cognitive processes in learning.