Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...

DNA as a Genetic Template

DNA as a Genetic Template

Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...

The DNA Helix

The DNA Helix

Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is the genetic material responsible for passing traits from generation to generation in all organisms and most viruses. DNA is composed of two strands of nucleotides that wind around each other to form a spring-like structure called a double helix. However, the double helix is not perfectly symmetrical. Instead, there are regularly occurring grooves in the structure. The major groove occurs where the sugar-phosphate backbones are relatively far apart. This space...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Transcriptional perturbation of LINE-1 elements reveals their cis-regulatory potential.

EMBO reports·2026

Same author

Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026

Same author

Cohesin cofactor dosage sets the rate of loop extrusion, rendering genome folding tunable yet vulnerable to genetic disruption.

Molecular cell·2026

Same author

Factors for a successful partnership between academia and industry.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026

Same author

Remodeling of <i>XIST</i> regulatory landscape during primate evolution.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Escape from X inactivation is directly modulated by Xist noncoding RNA.

Nature cell biology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Published on: August 15, 2013

Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH.

Luca Giorgetti¹, Edith Heard^2,3

¹Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. luca.giorgetti@fmi.ch.

|October 21, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and DNA FISH are key for studying 3D genome organization. This work compares these techniques, highlighting differences and biases, to guide accurate comparison of their results.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Getting an A with the 3Cs: Chromosome Conformation Capture for Undergraduates

Author Spotlight: Getting an A with the 3Cs: Chromosome Conformation Capture for Undergraduates

Published on: May 12, 2023

Studying DNA Looping by Single-Molecule FRET

Studying DNA Looping by Single-Molecule FRET

Published on: June 28, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Published on: August 15, 2013

Author Spotlight: Getting an A with the 3Cs: Chromosome Conformation Capture for Undergraduates

Author Spotlight: Getting an A with the 3Cs: Chromosome Conformation Capture for Undergraduates

Published on: May 12, 2023

Studying DNA Looping by Single-Molecule FRET

Studying DNA Looping by Single-Molecule FRET

Published on: June 28, 2014

Area of Science:

Genomics
Molecular Biology
Cell Biology

Background:

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and its variants are powerful tools for analyzing the 3D genome.
DNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) is widely used for visualizing genomic loci in interphase nuclei.
Both techniques are employed to study chromosome architecture, but their methodologies and interpretations differ.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare and contrast 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH for studying chromosome conformation.
To identify and discuss technical biases inherent in each method.
To review existing literature on the compatibility of 3C and FISH data.

Main Methods:

Review of 3C-based techniques (e.g., 3C, 4C, 5C, Hi-C).
Review of DNA FISH methodologies.
Analysis of published data comparing 3C and FISH results.
Proposal of an experimental framework for direct comparison.

Main Results:

3C techniques and DNA FISH are conceptually distinct, despite both probing 3D genome organization.
Each method possesses unique technical biases that influence data interpretation.
Compatibility between 3C and FISH findings is not always straightforward and requires careful consideration.

Conclusions:

Understanding the differences and biases of 3C and DNA FISH is crucial for accurate interpretation of 3D genome structure.
A standardized experimental approach is needed to directly compare results from these complementary techniques.
This work provides a framework for reconciling findings from 3C and FISH studies.