Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, average BP level and carotid arterial stiffness in the elderly: a
Insights
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (BP) variability and high average BP predict carotid arterial stiffness progression in elderly patients, especially those not using calcium channel blockers or using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Geriatrics
Background:
- Visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability is linked to artery remodeling.
- High-risk elderly individuals require understanding of factors influencing arterial changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of visit-to-visit BP variability and average BP on carotid artery remodeling progression.
- To analyze these effects based on antihypertension medication use.
Main Methods:
- 164 high-risk elderly subjects underwent BP measurements and carotid ultrasound over 1 year (12 visits).
- Visit-to-visit BP variability was quantified (s.d., CV, max, min, delta).
- Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and stiffness parameter β were measured at baseline and 4.2-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Systolic BP (SBP) variability (max, min, s.d.) and average SBP were associated with increased carotid stiffness (β-values).
- No significant association was found between BP variability and IMT changes.
- These associations were significant in subjects not using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and those using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs).
Conclusions:
- Exaggerated visit-to-visit SBP variability and high average SBP predict carotid arterial stiffness progression in high-risk elderly.
- This effect is particularly noted in patients not on CCBs or on RASIs.
Abstract:
In a cross-sectional study, visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability was shown to be associated with artery remodelling. Here, we investigated the impact of visit-to-visit BP variability and average BP on the carotid artery remodelling progression in high-risk elderly according to different classes of antihypertension medication use/non-use. BP measurements and carotid ultrasound were performed in the common carotid artery in 164 subjects (mean age 79.7 years at baseline, 74.7% females) with one or more cardiovascular risk factors. Based on 12 visits (1 × /month for 1 year), we calculated visit-to-visit BP variability expressed as the standard deviation (s.d.), coefficient of variation (CV), maximum BP, minimum BP and delta (maximum-minimum) BP. We measured mean intima-media thickness (IMT) as well as stiffness parameter β were measured at baseline and at the mean 4.2-year follow-up. In a multiple regression analysis, the maximum, minimum, s.d. and average of systolic BP (SBP) were significantly associated with a change in β-values between the baseline and follow-up after adjustment for age, smoking, lower high-density lipoprotein level, baseline β-value and follow-up period. There were no significant associations between the visit-to-visit BP variability measures and the change in mean IMT. Significant associations of maximum, minimum, s.d. and average SBP were found with increased β-values in the subjects without calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and in the subjects using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs). Thus, exaggerated visit-to-visit SBP variability and a high average SBP level were significant predictors of progression in carotid arterial stiffness in high-risk elderly without CCBs use and in those using a RASI.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

