Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.5K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtually the same? A comparison between in-person and virtual mock jury deliberations.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same author

Diverging Decisions? A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2025
Same author

Perceptions of "Stealthing" in Civil Court.

Violence against women·2025
Same author

Perceptions of Multiple Perpetrator Rape in the Courtroom.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Experts, commercial software, and the internal revenue service: American taxpayer perceptions of trust and procedural justice.

Law and human behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.

Brian H Bornstein1, Jonathan M Golding2, Jeffrey Neuschatz3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Law and Human Behavior
|October 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Student samples in jury research are valid. A meta-analysis found that using students versus non-students in jury simulations does not significantly impact most outcomes, including guilty verdicts and damages awarded.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Legal Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Jury simulation research is crucial for understanding legal decision-making.
  • Concerns exist regarding the generalizability of findings due to the frequent use of student mock jurors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To meta-analyze the impact of sample type (student vs. non-student) on jury simulation research outcomes.
  • To address debates about the verisimilitude and generalizability of jury simulation studies.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-analysis was conducted on 53 studies (N=17,716) examining criminal and civil jury outcomes.
  • Six dependent variables were analyzed: guilty verdicts, culpability, sentencing, liability verdicts, continuous liability, and damages.

Main Results:

  • Guilty verdicts, culpability ratings, and damage awards showed no significant variation between student and non-student samples.
  • Sentencing and liability judgments exhibited small or contradictory effect sizes, with inconsistent moderator effects.

Conclusions:

  • The use of student samples in jury simulation research is largely justifiable.
  • Concerns about sample differences limiting generalizability may be alleviated, particularly for key outcomes like verdicts and damages.