Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for research practice in Australia: NHMRC Statement & Professional Codes.

C A Berglund, P M McNeill

    Community Health Studies
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Giving and receiving of gifts between pharmaceutical companies and medical specialists in Australia.

    Internal medicine journal·2006
    Same author

    Cooperative partnerships or conflict-of-interest? A national survey of interaction between the pharmaceutical industry and medical organizations.

    Internal medicine journal·2005
    Same author

    A critical analysis of Australian clinical ethics committees and the functions they serve.

    Bioethics·2002
    Same author

    An ethics core curriculum for Australasian medical Schools.

    The Medical journal of Australia·2001
    Same author

    Clothes do not maketh the man.

    The Medical journal of Australia·2001
    Same author

    Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy as a complication of cat scratch disease.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2000
    Same journal

    From Medibank to Medicare: trends in Australian medical care costs and use from 1976 to 1986.

    Community health studies·1990
    Same journal

    The orifice revisited: women in gynaecological texts.

    Community health studies·1990
    Same journal

    Worksafe Australia: to the McKay report and beyond.

    Community health studies·1990
    Same journal

    Preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among prisoners: prisoners' and prison officers' knowledge of HIV and their attitudes to options for prevention.

    Community health studies·1990
    Same journal

    Accuracy of death certificates and mortality statistics in Victorian testis cancer deaths 1950-1977.

    Community health studies·1990
    Same journal

    Nursing home admissions: the effect of a multidisciplinary assessment team on the frequency of admission approvals.

    Community health studies·1990
    See all related articles

    This study compares the National Health and Medical Research Council

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Research Governance

    Background:

    • Professional Codes of Ethics and the National Health and Medical Research Council's (NHMRC) 'Statement on Human Experimentation and Supplementary Notes' provide guidelines for human participant research.
    • Key ethical principles guiding this research include beneficence, respect for persons, and justice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the ethical guidelines for human participant research from professional codes and the NHMRC.
    • To identify discrepancies in ethical considerations between these two sets of guidelines.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative analysis of the NHMRC's guidelines and various professional codes of ethics.
    • Examination focused on the principles of beneficence, respect for persons, and justice.

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchNational Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Significant differences were observed between the professional codes and the NHMRC Statement.
    • Discrepancies were particularly noted in the handling of confidentiality, research result reporting, and secondary data usage.

    Conclusions:

    • The NHMRC Statement may not be comprehensive enough to guide research across all scientific fields.
    • Further evaluation is needed to ensure the NHMRC guidelines adequately address diverse research contexts.