From 2000 to 2016: Which Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Ettore D'Argento1, Sabrina Rossi2, Giovanni Schinzari1

  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

New immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents offer options for EGFR wild-type, ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This paper identifies patient subgroups for optimal sequencing of treatments like nintedanib and nivolumab.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Treatment

Background:

  • Second-line treatment options for EGFR wild-type and ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have expanded.
  • New immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents are now available.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify patient subgroups eligible for different second-line therapy sequences in NSCLC.
  • To provide selection criteria beyond PD-L1 expression for nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current second-line treatment options for NSCLC.
  • Analysis of clinical criteria including performance status, smoking, comorbidities, histotype, platinum resistance, and progression speed.
  • Identification of subgroups for distinct therapeutic sequences.

Main Results:

  • Clear selection criteria are lacking for most NSCLC patients, except those with PD-L1 expression ≥50% for certain immunotherapies.
  • Clinical factors such as performance status, smoking history, and comorbidities are important.
  • Tumor characteristics like histotype, platinum resistance, and rapid progression influence treatment choice.

Conclusions:

  • Personalized selection criteria are needed to optimize second-line treatment sequences for EGFR wild-type, ALK-negative NSCLC.
  • Integrating clinical and tumor characteristics can guide the use of new agents like nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab.
  • Further research is warranted to refine treatment algorithms for NSCLC.