Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The role of cytochrome oxidases in bacterial virulence.

Infection and immunity·2026

Same author

Farmed Escapees Threaten MHC Diversity in Wild Atlantic Salmon.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same author

A single-cell blueprint for cellular diversity in the Green Lineage.

Current biology : CB·2026

Same author

Genomic evolution and climate related drivers of cholera surges in Dhaka Bangladesh between 1996 and 2024.

Communications medicine·2026

Same author

The Impact of Social Isolation on Treatment Burden Among Community-Dwelling Adults With Disability and Multimorbidity: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study in Urban China.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026

Same author

A Homozygous Deep Intronic SNX14 Variant Activates Pseudo-Exon Inclusion in a Patient with SCAR20.

Genes·2026

Same journal

Antimicrobial resistance and genomic characteristics of bovine Escherichia coli from five northern provinces of China.

BMC genomics·2026

Same journal

Reference-guided transcriptomics resolves CoHMGR family composition and expression diversification during postharvest warm conditioning of Camellia oleifera seed kernels.

BMC genomics·2026

Same journal

Multi-omics analysis identifies loci associated with pyrethroid resistance across sister species in the Anopheles gambiae species complex.

BMC genomics·2026

Same journal

Comparative and population genomics analyses of eared pheasants inhabiting highly varying altitudes.

BMC genomics·2026

Same journal

Identification of differentially expressed lncRNAs in different daily weight gains of Jiangquan black pigs and functional analysis of LOC100518120.

BMC genomics·2026

Same journal

A self-attention-based deep learning model for identifying key genes in insect pupal metamorphosis.

BMC genomics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples

Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples

Published on: April 17, 2015

A comparative study of ChIP-seq sequencing library preparation methods.

Arvind Y M Sundaram¹, Timothy Hughes¹, Shea Biondi²

¹Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

|October 23, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates seven low-input DNA library preparation methods for ChIP-seq. Certain reagents show consistent high performance, aiding researchers in selecting optimal methods for ChIP-seq analysis and improving dataset comparability.

Keywords:

Chromatin immunoprecipitation HTS Low-input Micro-ChIP NGS

More Related Videos

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

Published on: August 7, 2021

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples

Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples

Published on: April 17, 2015

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

Published on: August 7, 2021

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Genomics
Epigenetics

Background:

Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) is crucial for studying genome-wide protein-DNA interactions.
Library preparation is essential for sequencing ChIP-isolated DNA.
New methods for low-input DNA library preparation are emerging for rare cells and biopsy samples, but their performance is not well-characterized.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance of seven low-input DNA library preparation methods for ChIP-seq.
To assess biases and identify optimal reagents for ChIP-seq library preparation from limited DNA amounts.

Main Methods:

Seven low-input ChIP-seq library preparation methods were tested: Accel-NGS® 2S, Bowman-method, HTML-PCR, SeqPlex™, DNA SMART™, TELP, and ThruPLEX®.
Experiments used H3K4me3 ChIP material at 1 ng and 0.1 ng input levels, with five replicates per method.
Performance was evaluated against a PCR-free reference dataset, analyzing unmappable reads, duplicates, reproducibility, and peak-calling sensitivity/specificity.

Main Results:

Consistent high performance was observed for a subset of the evaluated library preparation reagents.
The study identified specific methods that excel in low-input ChIP-seq library preparation.
Variations in performance metrics such as read mapping, duplication rates, and peak calling accuracy were noted across methods.

Conclusions:

The findings provide guidance for researchers selecting reagents for low-input ChIP-seq library preparation.
This comparison is expected to promote the adoption of superior methods and drive innovation in the field.
The results will help assess the comparability of existing ChIP-seq datasets prepared using different library preparation techniques.