Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

12:43
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
Norms for disproportionate loss in speech intelligibility
M W Yellin1, J Jerger, R C Fifer
1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ear and Hearing
|August 1, 1989
Summary
Researchers established new benchmarks for identifying disproportionately poor speech intelligibility in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. These norms help detect when hearing difficulties significantly impact communication beyond typical expectations.
Area of Science:
- Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
- Sensorineural Hearing Loss Research
- Speech Intelligibility Assessment
Background:
- Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) can affect individuals differently, leading to varied impacts on speech understanding.
- Existing audiological assessments may not fully capture the extent of speech intelligibility deficits in some SNHL cases.
- Defining 'disproportionate loss' is crucial for accurate diagnosis and targeted intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop normative data for identifying "disproportionate loss" in speech intelligibility among individuals with cochlear SNHL.
- To establish empirical boundaries for speech intelligibility scores relative to pure-tone averages.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of audiometric records from 324 subjects with presumed cochlear sensorineural hearing loss.
- Development of scatterplots correlating speech intelligibility measures (PBmax, SSImax) with specific pure-tone averages (PTA2, PTA1).
- Construction of linear boundaries encompassing approximately 98% of observed data points.
Main Results:
- Empirically derived linear boundaries were established for two key relationships: PBmax vs. PTA2 and SSImax vs. PTA1.
- These boundaries define the expected range of speech intelligibility for given hearing thresholds.
- Scores falling below these boundaries indicate a 'disproportionately poor' speech intelligibility.
Conclusions:
- The study provides objective, data-driven criteria for identifying disproportionately poor speech intelligibility in SNHL.
- These findings can aid clinicians in better diagnosing and managing hearing-related communication challenges.
- The established norms enhance the precision of audiological assessments for speech understanding.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

