Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

1.0K
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
1.0K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

554
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
554
Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

308
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
308
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

691
Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of...
691
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.1K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prior reward contingencies influence the contents of working memory by biasing attention in space but not in time: Evidence from recognition of sequentially versus simultaneously presented sets of items.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Task Load Negatively Affects Critical Care Air Transport Team Performance in Simulation.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Metacognitive control of workflow enhances stimulus discriminability and reduces signal uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Changes in recent practices in research and publishing: A view from the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

The impact of alcohol intoxication on extended vigilance and rest-break recovery.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.7K

Updating metacognitive control in response to expected retention intervals.

Joshua L Fiechter1, Aaron S Benjamin2

  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. fiechte2@illinois.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|October 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

People rarely change how they study information based on expected test times, especially for short intervals. Significant differences in expected test timing are needed to influence memory encoding strategies.

Keywords:
Decision makingMemoryMetamemory

More Related Videos

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.4K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.7K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.4K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory
  • Learning Strategies

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals adapt their learning strategies based on future retrieval expectations is crucial in cognitive psychology.
  • Previous research suggests that learners may not always optimize their encoding processes in anticipation of varying retention intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether anticipated retention intervals influence encoding strategies in human subjects.
  • To determine if learners adjust their study methods based on expected test timing.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted using paired-associate learning (Graduate Record Exam words and synonyms).
  • Subjects were informed of either short or long expected retention intervals before studying word pairs.
  • Performance was analyzed based on actual versus expected retention intervals, including conditions with subject-controlled pacing.

Main Results:

  • No significant effect of expected retention intervals on encoding strategies was observed for shorter intervals (e.g., 1 min vs. 4 min, 30 s vs. 3 min).
  • A substantial difference in expected retention intervals (10 min vs. 24 h) led to subjects prioritizing items expected for sooner testing.
  • This suggests a trade-off in memory encoding effort based on perceived urgency of retrieval.

Conclusions:

  • Learners demonstrate a reluctance to modify encoding strategies on an item-by-item basis, even with control over study pacing.
  • Adjustments in encoding strategies, when they occur, are typically quantitative rather than qualitative, particularly with smaller differences in expected retention intervals.
  • The findings align with the test-expectancy literature, highlighting the limited flexibility in human memory encoding strategies relative to retrieval predictions.