Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
Published on: June 4, 2020
Rules versus layers: which side wins the battle of model calibration?
Yousef Sakieh1, Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny2, Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi2
1College of the Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Basij Square, Gorgan, Golestan Province, Iran. sakie.yusuf@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Continuous surface of urbanization suitability, as an input to many urban growth models (UGM), has a significant role on a proper calibration process. The present study evaluates and compares the simulation success of the Cellular Automata-Markov Chain (CA-MC) model through multiple methods. For this, a series of mapping algorithms are applied ranging from empirical methods such as multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) to statistical algorithms without spatially explicit suitability mapping rules such as logistic regression (LR) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network and finally statistical and spatially explicit rule-based methods such as SLEUTH-Genetic Algorithm (SLEUTH-GA) model. The CA-MC model was calibrated in three study locations including Azadshahr, Gonbad, and Gorgan cities in northeastern Iran. Applying Kappa-based indices (Kappa, K location, K Simulation, and K Transloc) and computing relative error (RE) values of landscape metrics, performance of the model was quantified and compared across the three study sites. The MCE and SLEUTH-GA methods, as the most data-demanding and the most computationally complex methods, respectively, yielded approximately similar results (especially in case of Kappa-based indices) and these methods were less successful compared to LR and MLP models. LR and MLP models were less data-demanding, while they produced approximately equal results. This study concludes that, when historical growth patterns feed an urbanization suitability mapping process, neither rules (SLEUTH-GA) nor layers (MCE) are effectively efficient when applied in a separated manner. Instead, methods with statistical rules and least-correlated input layers (LR and MLP) provide better simulation outputs. In contrast, methods such as MCE are more applicable when a non-path-dependent mapping procedure is desired since this method does not require training data (dependent variable) and the provided flexibilities in urbanization suitability mapping under various scenarios can improve the functionality of land-use change prediction algorithms into innovative land allocation tools.
More Related Videos
10:22Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Glassware Calibration
Volumetric flasks: Volumetric flasks are designed to prepare aqueous solutions of precise volumes accurately with a calibration line on the neck. To calibrate a volumetric flask, it is important to fill it with distilled...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Modeling and Similitude