Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Rescue and Characterization of Recombinant Virus from a New World Zika Virus Infectious Clone
Published on: June 7, 2017
Heart transplant outcomes in recipients of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) high risk donors
Athanasios Tsiouris1, Lynn Wilson1, Rajesh B Sekar1
1Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Insights
Using Centers for Disease Control (CDC) high-risk donor (HRD) hearts for transplantation is safe. HRD hearts, when seronegative, show similar outcomes and survival rates to standard-risk donor hearts without transmitting hepatitis or HIV.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Donor heart scarcity limits heart transplantation.
- Centers for Disease Control (CDC) high-risk donors (HRD) offer a potential solution with recipient consent.
- Outcomes of using HRD hearts, particularly regarding infectious disease transmission, require further definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of heart transplantation using CDC high-risk donor hearts.
- To assess posttransplant graft function, rejection rates, and survival in recipients of HRD hearts.
- To determine the incidence of hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission from HRD hearts.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 74 heart transplant recipients from August 2010 to December 2014.
- Comparison of recipients of HRD hearts (n=8) versus standard-risk donor (SRD) hearts (n=66).
- Statistical analysis included chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon two-sample tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in recipient demographics, pretransplant support, or CMV status between HRD and SRD groups.
- All HRD hearts were seronegative at transplant; no significant differences in rejection rates were observed.
- No HRD recipients acquired hepatitis or HIV; Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in five-year survival between HRD and SRD groups.
Conclusions:
- Seronegative HRD heart transplants demonstrate comparable graft function, rejection rates, and five-year survival to SRD heart transplants.
- The use of HRD hearts, when seronegative, did not result in hepatitis or HIV transmission in early follow-up at this institution.
Background:
A lack of donor hearts remains a major limitation of heart transplantation. Hearts from Centers for Disease Control (CDC) high-risk donors can be utilized with specific recipient consent. However, outcomes of heart transplantation with CDC high-risk donors are not well known. We sought to define outcomes, including posttransplant hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, in recipients of CDC high-risk donor hearts at our institution.
Methods:
All heart transplant recipients from August 2010 to December 2014 (n = 74) were reviewed. Comparison of 1) CDC high-risk donor (HRD) versus 2) standard-risk donor (SRD) groups were performed using chi-squared tests for nominal data and Wilcoxon two-sample tests for continuous variables. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results:
Of 74 heart transplant recipients reviewed, 66 (89%) received a SRD heart and eight (11%) received a CDC HRD heart. We found no significant differences in recipient age, sex, waiting list 1A status, pretransplant left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, and graft ischemia times (p = NS) between the HRD and SRD groups. All of the eight HRD were seronegative at the time of transplant. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in rejection rates at six and 12 months posttransplant. Importantly, no HRD recipients acquired hepatitis or HIV. Survival in HRD versus SRD recipients was not significantly different by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank p = 0.644) at five years posttransplant.
Conclusion:
Heart transplants that were seronegative at the time of transplant had similar posttransplant graft function, rejection rates, and five-year posttransplant survival versus recipients of SRD hearts. At our institution, no cases of hepatitis or HIV occurred in HRD recipients in early follow-up.
More Related Videos
09:54Postmortem Diagnosis of Rabies in Animals by the Updated, Multiplexed LN34 Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay
Published on: May 2, 2025
12:09Establishing a Liquid-covered Culture of Polarized Human Airway Epithelial Calu-3 Cells to Study Host Cell Response to Respiratory Pathogens In vitro
Published on: February 7, 2013