Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
Published on: September 24, 2017
Evaluation of an fMRI USPIO-based assay in healthy human volunteers
Richard Baumgartner1, William Cho1, Alexandre Coimbra1
1Merck & Co. Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Purpose:
To present the testretest and contrast dose effect results of cerebral blood volume (CBV) functional MRI (fMRI) in healthy human volunteers using ferumoxytol (Feraheme), an ultrasmall-superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticle.
Materials And Methods:
This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study in healthy young volunteers. In eight subjects, using a 3 Tesla field strength system, blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and CBV fMRI were acquired in response to a visual black-and-white checkboard stimulation paradigm using an escalating ferumoxytol dose design (250, 350, and 510 mg iron). Multiple outcome measures were analyzed including absolute percent signal change (|PSC|, primary endpoint), its contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and corresponding z-score, percent CBV change (ΔCBV) and respective CNR, concentration of Fe, and baseline CBV.
Results:
The |PSC| in the visual cortex increased with ferumoxytol dose and was up to 3 × higher than BOLD fMRI. Test-retest reliability was comparable for BOLD and CBV fMRI. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for |PSC| were 0.3 (one-sided 95% lower confidence limit = 0.00), 0.81 (0.47), 0.48 (0.00), and 0.3 (0.00) for BOLD and the 250-, 350-, and 510-mg doses of ferumoxytol, respectively. For ΔCBV, ICCs were 0.77 (0.37), 0.48 (0.00), and 0.49 (0.00) for 250 mg, 350 mg, and 510 mg, respectively.
Conclusion:
This work demonstrates that CBV fMRI techniques and endpoints are dose dependent, robust and have good test-retest repeatability. It also confirms previous findings that USPIO enhances sensitivity of fMRI stimulus-response endpoints.
Level Of Evidence:
1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:124-133.

