Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

847
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
847
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.2K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.2K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

295
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
295

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolated medial temporal lobe amnesia (MTLA): Predictor of cerebral amyloidosis or marker of phenotype-specific vulnerability?

Revue neurologique·2026
Same author

Amyloid PET imaging in France: One-year experience and perspectives.

Revue neurologique·2025
Same author

Pro-ictal, rather than pre-ictal, brain state marked by global critical slowing and local gamma power increase.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Epileptic seizures recorded with microelectrodes: A persistent multiscale gap between neuronal activity, micro-, and macro-LFP?

Revue neurologique·2025
Same author

International collaborative study to assess new stocks of candidate reference preparations to control the level of anti-D in IVIG

Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes·2024
Same author

Cortical type memory impairment in CADASIL: Watch out for the second train!

Revue neurologique·2024
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

From face processing to face recognition: Comparing three different processing levels.

G Besson1, G Barragan-Jason2, S J Thorpe2

  • 1Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France; CerCo CNRS UMR 5549, Pavillon Baudot CHU Purpan, BP 25202, 31052 Toulouse Cedex, France; Institut de neurosciences des systèmes, INSERM UMR 1106, Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, 27, Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France.

Cognition
|October 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human face recognition is surprisingly fast. Verifying a specific person in a crowd takes about a quarter of a second, faster than recognizing a familiar face but slower than basic face categorization.

Keywords:
Face categorizationFace detectionFace recognitionFamiliarityInversion effectReaction times

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Human face processing is crucial for social interaction.
  • The speed of individual face verification remains largely unknown.
  • Debate exists on whether face processing is entry-level or coarse-to-fine.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the minimal speed of individual face verification.
  • To compare face verification speed with face categorization and familiarity.
  • To investigate the effect of face inversion on different processing levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Speed and Accuracy Boosting (SAB) procedure to elicit fastest responses.
  • Compared three processing levels: superordinate categorization, familiarity recognition, and target person verification.
  • Presented stimuli in both upright and inverted orientations to 27 participants.

Main Results:

  • Individual face verification was achieved at approximately 260ms, faster than familiarity recognition (380ms).
  • Face categorization (240ms) was slightly faster than individual face verification.
  • Face verification and categorization were more sensitive to face inversion than familiarity recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Face recognition for identifying a specific person is achievable within 260ms.
  • Results support a coarse-to-fine processing model, favoring the 'superordinate advantage' hypothesis.
  • Distinguishes between individual face verification and familiarity recognition, both often conflated under 'face recognition'.