Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Perioperative and long-term impact of chronic kidney disease on carotid artery interventions
Derek Klarin1, Robert T Lancaster1, Emel Ergul1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases perioperative and late mortality risks after carotid procedures. However, patients with CKD benefit from stroke-free survival, suggesting carotid interventions are valuable in selected cases.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes following vascular interventions.
- CKD is associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
- Understanding the impact of CKD on carotid intervention outcomes is crucial for patient selection and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To stratify patients undergoing carotid intervention by CKD status.
- To evaluate the impact of CKD severity on periprocedural and late outcomes after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.
- To identify predictors of stroke, death, and long-term survival in patients with CKD undergoing carotid procedures.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 12,568 patients from the Vascular Study Group of New England database (2003-2013).
- Stratification of patients based on CKD severity: mild (eGFR >60), moderate (eGFR 30-59), and severe (eGFR <30).
- Evaluation of periprocedural (30-day) and late outcomes using univariate and multivariate analyses, including Cox hazards regression.
Main Results:
- The 30-day stroke rate was low across all CKD severity groups (1.34%-1.84%).
- 30-day mortality increased with worsening CKD severity (0.4% mild, 0.9% moderate, 0.9% severe).
- Severe CKD, ASA class 4/5, diabetes, and age were independent predictors of 30-day stroke or death; moderate and severe CKD predicted late death. 5-year survival for severe CKD patients was 71%.
Conclusions:
- CKD severity is associated with increased perioperative and late mortality after carotid interventions.
- Patients with CKD demonstrate stroke-free survival benefits, particularly after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- Carotid interventions are beneficial in carefully selected patients with moderate to severe CKD, especially those with symptomatic disease, offering significantly longer survival compared to other vascular conditions.
Objective:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases morbidity and mortality after vascular procedures and adversely affects late survival of patients. The presence of CKD also confers increased risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients undergoing carotid intervention in the Vascular Study Group of New England database were stratified by CKD status referable to periprocedural and late outcomes.
Methods:
All carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) performed from 2003 to 2013 were stratified by CKD severity as mild (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >60 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate (eGFR 30-59), and severe (eGFR <30). The impact of CKD on outcomes of carotid procedures was evaluated using univariate and multivariate methods.
Results:
Of 12,568 patients identified, 11,746 (93%) underwent CEA and 822 (7%) underwent carotid artery stenting. Procedures were performed for symptomatic disease in 40%. CKD severity was mild in 58%, moderate in 35%, and severe in 7%. The 30-day stroke rate was very low across all CKD groups (1.76% mild vs 1.84% moderate and 1.34% severe; P = .009). The 30-day mortality increased with worsening renal function (0.4% mild vs 0.9% moderate and 0.9% severe; P = .01). Independent predictors of 30-day stroke or death included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 or 5 (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.4; P = .0001). Multivariable Cox hazards regression showed that severe CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6), ASA class 4 or 5 (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2), preoperative cortical symptoms (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8), history of diabetes (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), and age (HR, 1.03/y; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04) independently (all P < .01) predicted neurologic events or death at median follow-up of 12.7 months (interquartile range, 10.3-15.2 months). CKD did not increase the risk of neurologic events at 1-year follow-up. Predictors (P < .05) of late death included moderate CKD (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.7), severe CKD (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-2.9), ASA class 4 or 5 (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0), history of diabetes (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8), and cortical symptoms (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.05-1.6). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates decreased with worsening renal function (log-rank test, P < .001), but patients with severe CKD maintained a 71% survival at 5 years.
Conclusions:
CKD severity increases risk of perioperative mortality as well as late mortality. Patients with CKD benefit from stroke-free survival especially after CEA. Unlike patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, for whom severe CKD reduces median survival to ∼2.5 years, patients with CKD and carotid disease exhibit much longer survival. This suggests that carotid interventions have utility in carefully selected patients with moderate and severe CKD, particularly in symptomatic disease.
More Related Videos
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
08:21A Modified Two Kidney One Clip Mouse Model of Renin Regulation in Renal Artery Stenosis
Published on: October 26, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction