Safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 in patients with baseline cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction

Bridgette A Kanz1, Megan H Pollack1, Romany Johnpulle2

  • 1Departments of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.

Abstract

Insights

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy shows promise for advanced cancers in patients with organ dysfunction. This study found tolerable immune-related adverse events and manageable organ dysfunction, with some patients experiencing treatment benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy is a growing treatment for advanced cancers.
  • Patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction are often excluded from clinical trials, limiting data on treatment safety and efficacy in this population.
  • These patients may have limited alternative treatment options, underscoring the need for effective therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction.
  • To assess changes in organ function, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in this patient group.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 27 patients with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction (cardiac, renal, or hepatic) treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.
  • Defined organ dysfunction criteria: cardiac (LVEF ≤45%), renal (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or GFR ≤30 ml/min), hepatic (liver enzyme elevations ≥3x ULN or cirrhosis).
  • Assessed irAEs, organ function changes, objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS.

Main Results:

  • The study included patients with renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and urothelial bladder cancer.
  • Baseline organ dysfunction included renal (n=17), hepatic (n=7), and cardiac (n=11); 8 patients had dysfunction in multiple organs.
  • 48% of patients showed ongoing treatment benefit (response or stable disease), with a median PFS of 168 days. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in 7% of patients.

Conclusions:

  • Anti-PD-1 therapy appears to be safe and effective in patients with advanced malignancies and baseline cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction.
  • Immune-related adverse events were tolerable and manageable, with infrequent worsening of organ dysfunction.
  • Objective responses and prolonged PFS were observed, suggesting that anti-PD-1 therapy can be considered for this patient population with careful monitoring.

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System01:26

Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

The activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) contributes to cardiac remodeling, and inhibiting the RAAS is a pharmacological target in heart failure management. As a result, neurohumoral modulation is a crucial treatment principle for managing heart failure. This approach involves using medications like ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and neutral...
1.3K
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment01:08

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

Hepatic impairment, characterized by decreased liver function, does not uniformly mandate adjustments in drug dosage. Whether dosage modifications are necessary depends on various factors related to the drug's metabolism and elimination pathways. If a drug is primarily excreted via the kidneys and bypasses significant hepatic processing, if it undergoes minimal metabolic transformation in the liver, or if it is volatile and primarily expelled through the lungs, dose adjustments may not be...
320
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics01:22

Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

Heart failure and kidney perfusion are interconnected in a complex way. Reduced renal perfusion and venous congestion are two significant factors that contribute to renal dysfunction in heart failure. The kidneys, primarily responsible for fluid balance in the body, are adversely affected due to compromised cardiac output and increased venous pressure. In response to reduced renal perfusion, the kidneys activate neurohumoral mechanisms to restore balance. However, these mechanisms can be...
1.1K
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
59
Heart Failure V: Medical Management01:30

Heart Failure V: Medical Management

Medical Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)The primary goals of therapy for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include:Relieving symptomsOptimizing volume statusSupporting oxygenation and ventilationMaintaining cardiac output (CO) and end-organ perfusionIdentifying and addressing the cause of ADHFPreventing complicationsProviding patient education on factors precipitating HF exacerbationPlanning for dischargeOngoing monitoring and assessment...
455
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess...
247