Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
Safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 in patients with baseline cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction
Bridgette A Kanz1, Megan H Pollack1, Romany Johnpulle2
1Departments of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
Background:
Anti-PD-1 therapy is increasingly used in various advanced malignancies. Patients with baseline organ dysfunction are largely excluded from clinical trials. Therefore it is unclear whether anti-PD-1 therapy is safe or effective in this setting. Further, these patients are often not candidates for other anti-cancer therapies, highlighting their need for active treatment options.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients from multiple centers with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction who received anti-PD-1 therapy. Organ dysfunction was defined as cardiac (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45 %), renal (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or GFR ≤30 ml/min) or hepatic dysfunction (evidence of cirrhosis on imaging or AST, ALT or bilirubin ≥3x ULN). We assessed change in organ dysfunction, immune related adverse events (irAEs), response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results:
We identified 27 patients eligible for inclusion with the following diseases: renal cell carcinoma (n = 8), melanoma (10), non-small cell lung cancer (3), small cell lung cancer (2) and urothelial bladder cancer (4). Baseline organ dysfunction included renal dysfunction (n = 17), hepatic dysfunction (7), cardiac dysfunction (11), including >1 organ dysfunction (8). Worsening organ dysfunction requiring hospitalization or dose delays occurred in 8 patients (30 %) although in most cases this was thought not-drug related and resolved with supportive care. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in 2 pts (7 %; hepatitis and colitis). Thirteen of 27 patients had ongoing treatment benefit (objective response or stable disease) at data collection (48 %). Eleven patients had primary progressive disease (41 %), 11 had stable disease (41 %), 4 had partial responses (15 %), and one had a complete response (4 %). Overall, median PFS was 168 days. Median OS was not reached.
Conclusions:
In our experience, anti-PD-1 agents in this group of patients with cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction were associated with tolerable irAEs and infrequent manageable worsening of organ dysfunction. Further, objective responses and prolonged PFS were observed in a number of patients. Thus, patients with baseline organ dysfunction may be considered for anti-PD-1 therapy with appropriate clinical monitoring.
Insights
Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy shows promise for advanced cancers in patients with organ dysfunction. This study found tolerable immune-related adverse events and manageable organ dysfunction, with some patients experiencing treatment benefit.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy is a growing treatment for advanced cancers.
- Patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction are often excluded from clinical trials, limiting data on treatment safety and efficacy in this population.
- These patients may have limited alternative treatment options, underscoring the need for effective therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction.
- To assess changes in organ function, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 27 patients with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction (cardiac, renal, or hepatic) treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.
- Defined organ dysfunction criteria: cardiac (LVEF ≤45%), renal (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or GFR ≤30 ml/min), hepatic (liver enzyme elevations ≥3x ULN or cirrhosis).
- Assessed irAEs, organ function changes, objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS.
Main Results:
- The study included patients with renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and urothelial bladder cancer.
- Baseline organ dysfunction included renal (n=17), hepatic (n=7), and cardiac (n=11); 8 patients had dysfunction in multiple organs.
- 48% of patients showed ongoing treatment benefit (response or stable disease), with a median PFS of 168 days. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in 7% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Anti-PD-1 therapy appears to be safe and effective in patients with advanced malignancies and baseline cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction.
- Immune-related adverse events were tolerable and manageable, with infrequent worsening of organ dysfunction.
- Objective responses and prolonged PFS were observed, suggesting that anti-PD-1 therapy can be considered for this patient population with careful monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

