Minimally Circulatory-Assisted On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients With Complex Conditions

Tomohiro Mizuno1, Koso Egi2, Kenji Sakai3

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Machida Municipal Hospital, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

Artificial Organs
|October 27, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Minimally circulatory-assisted on-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting (MICAB) offers a safe alternative to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), especially for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with dilated left ventricles. MICAB demonstrates comparable outcomes to OPCAB.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Cardiac Anesthesia
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is challenging in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients due to potential circulatory deterioration from heart manipulation.
  • Minimally circulatory-assisted on-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting (MICAB) was developed to address these challenges by providing controlled circulatory support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MICAB compared to OPCAB in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
  • To assess MICAB's suitability for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and dilated left ventricles (LV) or small target coronary arteries.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 37 patients who underwent MICAB and 37 consecutive patients who underwent OPCAB between September 2006 and March 2012.
  • MICAB involved controlled minimal support flow to maintain specific blood pressure parameters, optimizing circulation.
  • Outcomes including graft details, perioperative renal function, morbidity, and mortality were compared between the two groups.

Main Results:

  • The MICAB group showed significantly higher lowest mixed venous oxygen saturation (83.8% vs. 71.6%, P < 0.001) compared to OPCAB.
  • No significant differences were observed in the number of grafts, complete revascularization rates (94.6% vs. 97.3%), acute patency rates (98.9% vs. 99.2%), 30-day mortality (2.7% vs. 0%), cerebrovascular complications, or new renal failure.
  • Early and mid-term results, including freedom from all-cause death (82.9% vs. 86.5%) and cardiac events at 3 years (96.4% vs. 96.4%), were comparable between groups.

Conclusions:

  • MICAB is a safe and effective alternative to OPCAB, particularly for patients with AMI and dilated LV.
  • MICAB facilitates high rates of complete revascularization and graft patency while preserving end-organ function.
  • The procedure offers comparable early and mid-term clinical outcomes to traditional OPCAB.