Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F−
Published on: July 27, 2018
Spin-orbit coupling with approximate equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method for ionization potential and electron
Zhanli Cao1, Fan Wang1, Mingli Yang1
1Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Physics and Technology, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, People's Republic of China.
Approximate equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOM-CC) methods offer computational savings for ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EAs). CCSD-3 provides accurate results with spin-orbit coupling (SOC), though CC2 better captures SO splitting.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOM-CC) methods are crucial for calculating electronic properties like ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EAs).
- Including spin-orbit coupling (SOC) enhances accuracy for systems with heavy elements but significantly increases computational cost.
- Developing computationally efficient approximations is vital for broader applicability of EOM-CC methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and propose approximate cluster amplitude calculation methods for EOM-CC approaches.
- To reduce the computational expense associated with EOM-CC calculations of IPs and EAs, particularly when including SOC.
- To evaluate the accuracy of these approximate methods against full coupled-cluster (CC) calculations.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of approximate EOM-CC methods, specifically CCSD-1 and CCSD-3.
- Comparison of results from approximate methods (CCSD-1, CCSD-3, CC2) with full coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) calculations.
- Inclusion of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in post-self-consistent field (SCF) calculations.
Main Results:
- The CCSD-1 approximation provides reasonable IPs and EAs without SOC, comparable to CCSD, and is more economical than CC2.
- The CCSD-3 approximation shows the closest agreement with CCSD for IPs and EAs when SOC is included.
- While CCSD-3 and CCSD-1 show less accurate spin-orbit (SO) splitting, EOM-CC with CC2 generally yields the best agreement with CCSD for SO splitting.
Conclusions:
- Approximate EOM-CC methods, such as CCSD-1 and CCSD-3, can significantly reduce computational cost for calculating IPs and EAs.
- Accurate treatment of SOC effects requires a balanced consideration of both single and double excitation amplitudes.
- CC2 offers a good balance for capturing SO splitting, while CCSD-3 is competitive for IPs and EAs with SOC included.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Molecular Orbital Theory I

