Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026
12:45
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
6.8K
[Long-term results after robot-assisted adenoma enucleation]
1Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68513, Mannheim, Deutschland. axel.haecker@umm.de.
Der Urologe. Ausg. A
|October 28, 2016
Summary
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy offers potential benefits like reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays for large prostates. However, longer operative times are noted, and more comparative studies are needed to confirm its advantages over open surgery.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Technology
Background:
- Open simple prostatectomy is an effective treatment for large-volume prostates.
- Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is emerging as an alternative surgical approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy.
- To compare RASP outcomes with traditional open simple prostatectomy.
Main Methods:
- Review of 16 series with level 3 evidence on RASP.
- Analysis of reported outcomes including blood loss, transfusion rates, hospital stay, and complications.
Main Results:
- RASP shows potential to reduce intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rates, hospital stay, and complications.
- RASP is associated with longer operative times compared to open procedures.
- Published evidence (level 3) demonstrates the safety and efficacy of RASP.
Conclusions:
- RASP is a safe and effective option for selected patients with large prostates.
- Long-term data and comparative outcome studies are needed to fully establish RASP benefits against open simple prostatectomy and transurethral laser enucleation.
