Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Real-World High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement
Published on: February 22, 2022
Interindividual Variation in the Relationship of Different Intensity Markers-A Challenge for Targeted Training
Florian Egger1, Tim Meyer1, Anne Hecksteden1
1Saarland University, Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Purpose:
Training intensities are frequently prescribed as relative workloads based on a single reference value (e.g. maximum oxygen uptake). However, exercise-induced physical strain is multifaceted and large interindividual variability in intensity markers has been reported for constant load exercise with standardized relative intensity. This questions the accuracy of (univariate) relative intensities in targeting specific training stimuli. The present trial aims to investigate interindividual variability in the relationship of strain indicators using interpolated performance curves derived from constant load tests at different workloads. This approach enables the prediction of other indicators based on a chosen reference and subsequent comparison of predictive accuracy between group-based and individualized regression models.
Methods:
15 competitive cyclists completed a stepwise incremental cycling test followed by 5 constant load tests with the same absolute workloads as in the stepwise incremental test. The highest of theses workloads which yielded a lactate (BLa) steady state was repeated enabling estimation of intraindividual variability. From constant load tests, the courses of BLa relative to the respective reference value (e.g. %VO2peak) were interpolated by polynomial regression. Variability between individual regression curves was analyzed by mixed modeling. Predictive accuracy was estimated as the sum of squared differences between predicted and observed values.
Results:
The proportion of total variation in the course of BLa relative to the respective reference parameter accounted for by subject identity ranged between 36 and 51%. A significant increase in predictive accuracy was observed for VO2peak and HRmax, respectively, as predicting parameters.
Conclusion:
These results are in support of a multivariable, individualized approach to intensity prescriptions when aiming at accurately targeted perturbations of homeostasis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Intensity of Dose-Effect Relationship
Regression Toward the Mean
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...

