Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
Development of a clinical feeding assessment scale for very young infants in South Africa
Mari Viviers1, Alta Kritzinger, Bart Vinck
1Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria. marimviviers@gmail.com.
Insights
A new Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) was developed for South Africa to aid in diagnosing oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in high-risk neonates. This validated instrument addresses needs in resource-limited settings.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Speech-language pathology
- Clinical assessment tools
Background:
- Validated neonatal feeding assessment instruments are needed in South Africa.
- A locally developed tool can standardize high-risk neonate evaluations in resource-constrained settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and content-validate a clinical feeding assessment scale for diagnosing oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in neonates.
Main Methods:
- The Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) was created using the Delphi method.
- An expert panel of five international and South African speech-language therapists (SLTs) participated in two rounds of electronic questionnaires.
Main Results:
- The Delphi process refined the NFAS from 240 items across 8 sections to 211 items across 6 sections.
- The final NFAS uses a binary scoring system to diagnose OPD and was agreed upon by all participants regarding format, scoring, and constructs.
Conclusions:
- The Delphi method facilitated the development of the NFAS for clinical use in South Africa and similar developing contexts.
- The NFAS is intended for clinicians managing neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.
- Further validation, including criterion validity against modified barium swallow studies, is recommended.
Background:
There is a need for validated neonatal feeding assessment instruments in South Africa. A locally developed instrument may contribute to standardised evaluation procedures of high-risk neonates and address needs in resource constrained developing settings.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to develop and validate the content of a clinical feeding assessment scale to diagnose oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in neonates.
Method:
The Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) was developed using the Delphi method. Five international and South African speech-language therapists (SLTs) formed the expert panel, participating in two rounds of electronic questionnaires to develop and validate the content of the NFAS.
Results:
All participants agreed on the need for the development of a valid clinical feeding assessment instrument to use with the neonatal population. The initial NFAS consisted of 240 items across 8 sections, and after the Delphi process was implemented, the final format was reduced to 211 items across 6 sections. The final format of the NFAS is scored using a binary scoring system guiding the clinician to diagnose the presence or absence of OPD. All members agreed on the format, the scoring system and the feeding constructs addressed in the revised final format of the NFAS.
Conclusion:
The Delphi method and the diverse clinical and research experience of participants could be integrated to develop the NFAS which may be used in clinical practice in South Africa or similar developing contexts. Because of demographically different work settings marked by developed versus developing contexts, participants did not have the same expectations of a clinical dysphagia assessment. The international participants contributed to evidence-based content development. Local participants considered the contextual challenges of South African SLTs entering the field with basic competencies in neonatal dysphagia management, thereby justifying a comprehensive clinical instrument. The NFAS is aimed at clinicians working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units where they manage large caseloads of high-risk neonates. Further validation of the NFAS is recommended to determine its criterion validity in comparison with a widely accepted standard such as the modified barium swallow study.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...

