Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Colonial Wig Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: March 12, 2019
Short- and long-term outcomes from percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension
Wiriyaporn Ridtitid1,2, Glen A Lehman1, James L Watkins1
1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J) placement shows a high technical success rate. While tube malfunctions are common, PEG-J significantly reduces hospitalizations and improves nutrition in chronic pancreatitis patients.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Surgical Procedures
Background:
- Limited data exists on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J).
- Evaluating adverse events and clinical impact of PEG-J is crucial, especially for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess adverse events associated with PEG-J procedures.
- To determine the clinical impact of PEG-J in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP).
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of patients undergoing PEG-J placement between 2010-2012.
- Assessed short- and long-term complications of PEG-J.
- Analyzed changes in weight and hospitalizations in the CP subgroup pre- and post-PEG-J.
Main Results:
- Overall technical success rate for PEG-J was 97%.
- 58% of patients experienced at least one tube malfunction (e.g., dislodgement, clogging, kinking).
- In the CP subgroup, PEG-J led to increased body weight and BMI, and significantly reduced hospitalizations and inpatient days.
Conclusions:
- PEG-J demonstrates a high technical success rate with no major complications observed.
- Tube malfunctions are frequent but manageable, with jejunal feeding via PEG-J significantly improving outcomes in CP patients.
Background:
There is a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J). We evaluated adverse events related to PEG-J and determined the clinical impact of PEG-J in those with chronic pancreatitis (CP).
Methods:
This cohort study included all patients who underwent PEG-J placement in a tertiary-care academic medical center between 2010 and 2012. Main outcome measurements were (1) short- and long-term complications related to PEG-J and (2) changes in weight and hospitalizations during the 12-month period before and after PEG-J in the CP subgroup.
Results:
Of 102 patients undergoing PEG-J placement, the overall technical success rate was 97 %. During a median follow-up period of 22 months (1-46 months, n = 90), at least one tube malfunction occurred in 52/90 (58 %; 177 episodes) after a median of 53 days (3-350 days), requiring a median of two tube replacements. Short-term (<30 days) tube malfunction occurred in 28/90 (31 %) and delayed in 24/90 (27 %); these included dislodgement (29 %), clogging (26 %) and kinking (14 %). In the CP subgroup (n = 58), mean body weight (kg) (70 vs. 71, p = 0.06) and body mass index (kg/m2, 26 vs. 27, p = 0.05) increased post-PEG-J. Mean number of hospitalizations (5 vs. 2, p < 0.0001) and inpatient days per 12 months (22 vs. 12, p = 0.005) decreased.
Conclusions:
While we observed no major complications related to PEG-J, half of patients had at least one episode of tube malfunction. In the CP subgroup, jejunal feeding via PEG-J significantly reduced the number of hospitalizations and inpatients days, while improving nutritional parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...

