[Diagnostic accuracy of the ADOS-2 taking account of gender effects]
Inge Kamp-Becker1, Anika Langmann1, Thomas Stehr1
11 Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg und Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Objectives:
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) is a revision of the standardized assessment for individuals with suspected autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The study examines the diagnostic accuracy of the original and revised algorithms for Modules 1 through 3.
Methods:
In a large clinical sample of children and adolescents (N = 1080, age 1.7 to 20.5), the differentiation of ASD from relevant differential diagnoses was investigated. As studies on the diagnostic accuracy for girls are sparse, comparisons concerning the diagnostic accuracy for gender subgroups were undertaken.
Results:
The revised algorithms exhibit an improvement in sensitivity (84.9 %) and a slight reduction in specificity (85.7 %). The improvements in the ADOS-2 pertain especially to cases with core autism and girls. Including the repetitive behavior domain in the algorithm contributes to a correct clinical ASD classification in modules 2 and 3. This was not found for younger children examined with module 1. Results also suggest less effective diagnostic differentiation for children and adolescents with internalizing disorders and conduct disorder.
Conclusions:
Good diagnostic accuracy was found for children in the average range of cognitive abilities. Results suggest good diagnostic utility for the ADOS-2 in clinical settings, provided that thorough diagnostics are given by experienced examiners.
Related Concept Videos
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development


