Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
Published on: May 27, 2021
Discovering Outliers of Potential Drug Toxicities Using a Large-scale Data-driven Approach
1Center for Biomedical Data and Language Processing, Department of Health Informatics and Administration, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.; Department of Health Informatics and Administration, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.; College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract:
We systematically compared the adverse effects of cancer drugs to detect event outliers across different clinical trials using a data-driven approach. Because many cancer drugs are toxic to patients, better understanding of adverse events of cancer drugs is critical for developing therapies that could minimize the toxic effects. However, due to the large variabilities of adverse events across different cancer drugs, methods to efficiently compare adverse effects across different cancer drugs are lacking. To address this challenge, we present an exploration study that integrates multiple adverse event reports from clinical trials in order to systematically compare adverse events across different cancer drugs. To demonstrate our methods, we first collected data on 186,339 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and selected 30 common cancer drugs. We identified 1602 cancer trials that studied the selected cancer drugs. Our methods effectively extracted 12,922 distinct adverse events from the clinical trial reports. Using the extracted data, we ranked all 12,922 adverse events based on their prevalence in the clinical trials, such as nausea 82%, fatigue 77%, and vomiting 75.97%. To detect the significant drug outliers that could have a statistically high possibility of causing an event, we used the boxplot method to visualize adverse event outliers across different drugs and applied Grubbs' test to evaluate the significance. Analyses showed that by systematically integrating cross-trial data from multiple clinical trial reports, adverse event outliers associated with cancer drugs can be detected. The method was demonstrated by detecting the following four statistically significant adverse event cases: the association of the drug axitinib with hypertension (Grubbs' test, P < 0.001), the association of the drug imatinib with muscle spasm (P < 0.001), the association of the drug vorinostat with deep vein thrombosis (P < 0.001), and the association of the drug afatinib with paronychia (P < 0.01).
Insights
This study developed a data-driven method to compare cancer drug adverse events across clinical trials. It identified statistically significant adverse event outliers, aiding in the development of safer cancer therapies.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Clinical Trial Data Analysis
- Oncology Drug Safety
Background:
- Understanding cancer drug adverse events is crucial for developing safer therapies.
- Existing methods lack efficiency in comparing diverse adverse event profiles across cancer drugs.
- Variability in adverse events necessitates systematic comparison methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and demonstrate a data-driven approach for systematically comparing adverse events of cancer drugs across clinical trials.
- To identify statistically significant adverse event outliers associated with specific cancer drugs.
- To enhance the understanding of drug toxicity and inform the development of safer cancer treatments.
Main Methods:
- Collected data from 186,339 clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on 30 common cancer drugs and 1602 associated trials.
- Extracted and analyzed 12,922 distinct adverse events, ranking them by prevalence (e.g., nausea, fatigue).
- Employed boxplot visualization and Grubbs' test to detect statistically significant adverse event outliers across different drugs.
Main Results:
- Successfully extracted and ranked a comprehensive list of adverse events associated with common cancer drugs.
- Identified statistically significant adverse event outliers, including axitinib with hypertension, imatinib with muscle spasm, vorinostat with deep vein thrombosis, and afatinib with paronychia.
- Demonstrated the effectiveness of the integrated cross-trial data approach in detecting significant drug-event associations.
Conclusions:
- The developed data-driven method effectively integrates cross-trial data to systematically compare cancer drug adverse events.
- This approach enables the detection of significant adverse event outliers, contributing to improved oncology drug safety.
- The findings support the development of targeted strategies to mitigate toxic effects of cancer therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Discovery: Overview
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug Toxicity: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

