Can We Trust Knee Meniscus Studies? One-Way Crossover Confounds Intent-to-Treat Statistical Methods
Abstract:
Randomized controlled studies have a high level of evidence. However, some patients are not treated in the manner to which they were randomized and actually switch to the alternative treatment (crossover). In such cases, "intent-to-treat" statistical methods require that such a switch be ignored, resulting in bias. Thus, the study conclusions could be wrong. This bias is a common problem in the knee meniscus literature.
More Related Videos
07:06Destabilization of the Medial Meniscus and Cartilage Scratch Murine Model of Accelerated Osteoarthritis
Published on: July 6, 2022
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
McNemar's Test
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
