Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

Feedback Loops

Feedback Loops

In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.

Feedback Inhibition

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

Effects of feedback

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

What do patients think about home-based testing for better asthma diagnosis? Insights from a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

How does patient complexity differ between people with and without cancer who access specialist community palliative care? A comparative analysis study in Western Sydney specialist community palliative care.

BMJ public health·2026

Same author

Expectations and attitudes in primary care towards home-based testing for diagnosing asthma: a mixed methods study.

BJGP open·2026

Same author

Activity PRN: Establishing meaningful occupation as and when required across acute inpatient mental health and psychiatric intensive care units.

The British journal of occupational therapy·2025

Same author

Screen use at bedtime can impact on the duration and quality of sleep among youths.

Evidence-based nursing·2025

Same author

Reducing smartphone screen time can improve sleep and overall well-being.

Evidence-based nursing·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Responding to, and learning from, peer review feedback.

Joanna Smith¹, Linda Milnes¹

¹University of Leeds.

Nursing Children and Young People

|November 9, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Peer review is a critical research process where independent experts evaluate scientific work. This ensures the quality and validity of research proposals, reports, and papers before publication.

More Related Videos

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Published on: May 8, 2018

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Published on: May 8, 2018

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Area of Science:

Scientific publishing
Research integrity

Background:

Peer review is a cornerstone of academic publishing.
It involves evaluation by independent experts.

Purpose of the Study:

To define the process and importance of peer review in research.

Main Methods:

Assessment of research proposals.
Evaluation of research reports.
Scrutiny of scientific papers.

Main Results:

Ensures scientific quality.
Validates research findings.
Maintains academic standards.

Conclusions:

Peer review is essential for credible scientific communication.
Independent expert assessment upholds research integrity.