Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
Published on: July 11, 2025
Do Macrophylogenies Yield Stable Macroevolutionary Inferences? An Example from Squamate Reptiles.
Pascal O Title1, Daniel L Rabosky1
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Large phylogenetic trees (macrophylogenies) offer evolutionary insights but show significant discordance in analyses of Australian squamate reptiles. Accurately representing uncertainty in these trees remains a key challenge for macroevolution research.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Phylogenetics
- Macroevolution
Background:
- Advances in phylogenetic data generation and analysis allow for the creation of large phylogenies (macrophylogenies) with thousands of taxa.
- Macrophylogenies enable evolutionary analyses across broad phylogenetic scales, facilitating studies on speciation, extinction, and phenotypic evolution.
- These large trees often exhibit substantial phylogenetic uncertainty, and the reliability of macroevolutionary inferences derived from them requires rigorous exploration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the congruence of inferences from five recent, large phylogenies (each >4000 species) for squamate reptiles.
- To investigate whether these phylogenies yield consistent results regarding the processes influencing species richness variation in Australian snake and lizard radiations.
- To assess the stability of macroevolutionary inferences derived from macrophylogenies.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of five distinct, recently published phylogenies for squamate reptiles, each comprising over 4000 species.
- Examination of clade age, diversification rate metrics, and their relationship with species richness across Australian snake and lizard evolutionary radiations.
- Comparison of ages derived from the large phylogenies with existing literature-reported crown clade ages for Australian groups.
Main Results:
- Significant discordance was found across the five phylogenies regarding clade age and diversification rate metrics.
- The influence of clade age on species richness varied inconsistently across the phylogenies.
- Crown clade ages for Australian squamate groups from the literature conflicted with the ages derived from all five large phylogenies.
Conclusions:
- Macrophylogenies provide powerful tools for addressing evolutionary and ecological questions at broad phylogenetic scales.
- Substantial uncertainty inherent in macrophylogenies presents a critical challenge for robust macroevolutionary inference.
- Further development is needed to accurately represent and address phylogenetic uncertainty in large-scale evolutionary analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogeny
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
The Evidence for Evolution

