Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Collecting And Measuring Wound Exudate Biochemical Mediators In Surgical Wounds
Published on: October 20, 2012
Analysis of Malpractice Claims Associated with Surgical Site Infection in the Field of Plastic Surgery
Bo Young Park1, Jung Woo Kwon1, So Ra Kang1
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract:
Postoperative infections are rare after plastic surgery; however, when present, they can affect the aesthetic outcome. Currently, many malpractice lawsuits are associated with surgical site infection. The present study aimed to analyze malpractice claims associated with surgical site infection in the field of plastic surgery through a review of Korean precedents. We analyzed the type of procedure, associated complications, and legal judgment in these cases. Most claimants were women, and claims were most often related to breast surgery. The common complications related to surgical site infection were deformity, scar, and asymmetry. Among the 40 cases, 34 were won by the plaintiff, and the mean claim settlement was 2,832,654 KRW (USD 2,636.6). The reasons for these judgements were as follows: 1) immediate bacterial culture tests were not performed and appropriate antibiotics were not used; 2) patients were not transferred to a high-level hospital or the infection control department was not consulted; 3) surgical site infection control measures were not appropriate; and 4) surgical procedures were performed without preoperative explanation about surgical site infection. The number of claims owing to surgical site infection after surgery is increasing. Infection handling was one of the key factors that influenced the judgement, and preoperative explanation about the possibility of infection is important. The findings will help surgeons achieve high patient satisfaction and reduce liability concerns.
Insights
Surgical site infections after plastic surgery can lead to malpractice claims, particularly in breast augmentation. Proper infection control and preoperative patient explanation are crucial for reducing legal risks and improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Medical Malpractice Law
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Postoperative infections are infrequent but can significantly impact aesthetic results in plastic surgery.
- Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common cause of malpractice litigation in cosmetic and reconstructive procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze malpractice claims related to SSIs in Korean plastic surgery cases.
- To identify common procedures, complications, and legal outcomes associated with SSIs.
Main Methods:
- Review of Korean legal precedents involving SSIs in plastic surgery.
- Analysis of case details including procedure type, complications, and judicial decisions.
Main Results:
- Most claimants were female, with breast surgery being the most frequent procedure.
- Common complications included deformity, scarring, and asymmetry.
- Plaintiffs won 34 out of 40 cases, with an average settlement of approximately $2,636 USD.
Conclusions:
- Inadequate infection management, including delayed cultures, inappropriate antibiotic use, and insufficient consultation, contributed to unfavorable legal judgments.
- Failure to provide adequate preoperative explanations regarding SSI risks is a significant factor in malpractice claims.
- Increasing SSI claims highlight the need for enhanced infection control protocols and transparent patient communication in plastic surgery.
