Analysis of Malpractice Claims Associated with Surgical Site Infection in the Field of Plastic Surgery

Bo Young Park1, Jung Woo Kwon1, So Ra Kang1

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Insights

Surgical site infections after plastic surgery can lead to malpractice claims, particularly in breast augmentation. Proper infection control and preoperative patient explanation are crucial for reducing legal risks and improving outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Medical Malpractice Law
  • Infectious Disease Control

Background:

  • Postoperative infections are infrequent but can significantly impact aesthetic results in plastic surgery.
  • Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common cause of malpractice litigation in cosmetic and reconstructive procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze malpractice claims related to SSIs in Korean plastic surgery cases.
  • To identify common procedures, complications, and legal outcomes associated with SSIs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Korean legal precedents involving SSIs in plastic surgery.
  • Analysis of case details including procedure type, complications, and judicial decisions.

Main Results:

  • Most claimants were female, with breast surgery being the most frequent procedure.
  • Common complications included deformity, scarring, and asymmetry.
  • Plaintiffs won 34 out of 40 cases, with an average settlement of approximately $2,636 USD.

Conclusions:

  • Inadequate infection management, including delayed cultures, inappropriate antibiotic use, and insufficient consultation, contributed to unfavorable legal judgments.
  • Failure to provide adequate preoperative explanations regarding SSI risks is a significant factor in malpractice claims.
  • Increasing SSI claims highlight the need for enhanced infection control protocols and transparent patient communication in plastic surgery.