Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026
06:42
Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
Published on: June 8, 2018
9.8K
Experimental Time-Optimal Universal Control of Spin Qubits in Solids
Jianpei Geng1, Yang Wu1, Xiaoting Wang2,3
1CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Physical Review Letters
|November 9, 2016
Summary
Researchers achieved time-optimal universal control for spin qubits in diamond, a significant advancement for quantum computing. This breakthrough enables faster, high-fidelity quantum operations, paving the way for practical quantum technologies.
Area of Science:
- Quantum physics
- Quantum information science
- Solid-state quantum computing
Background:
- Quantum control is crucial for advancing science and technology.
- Achieving high-fidelity, universal, and time-optimal quantum control is a key challenge.
- Previous methods have not experimentally realized time-optimal universal control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally demonstrate time-optimal universal control of spin qubits.
- To implement accurate minimum-time quantum gates for single and multiple qubits.
- To advance the field of time-optimal quantum control.
Main Methods:
- Generalizing quantum brachistochrone equations to solve for minimum-time protocols.
- Experimental implementation of control protocols on spin qubits in diamond.
- Utilizing quantum process tomography to verify gate fidelities.
Main Results:
- Successful experimental realization of time-optimal universal control for spin qubits.
- Accurate minimum-time protocols were obtained for multiple qubits.
- Single- and two-qubit gates achieved 99% fidelity.
Conclusions:
- This work provides a practical route for time-optimal quantum control.
- It unlocks new capabilities for quantum systems and technologies.
- It establishes a foundation for future research in time-optimal control.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.6K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.6K
01:03Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
2.1K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
2.1K
01:14Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
2.5K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
2.5K
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.9K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.9K
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.6K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.6K
01:23Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes
1.3K
In the absence of an external magnetic field, nuclear spin states are degenerate and randomly oriented. When a magnetic field is applied, the spins begin to precess and orient themselves along (lower energy) or against (higher energy) the direction of the field. At equilibrium, a slight excess population of spins exists in the lower energy state. Because the direction of the magnetic field is fixed as the z-axis, the precessing magnetic moments are randomly oriented around the z-axis.
1.3K